@michaljakubczyk.bsky.social
People's attitudes to the future differ — from "No future" to "Tomorrow is simply today – only tomorrow." What about in health-state valuation? I find no simple discounting model fits the data. Don't put reading the paper off until tomorrow: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Eliciting discounting model and direction at the individual level with time trade-off follow-up questions - The European Journal of Health Economics
Objective Time preference is increasingly considered in health state valuation. As its inclusion impacts the produced value sets, it is important to account for it using the correct specification. Var...
link.springer.com
November 12, 2025 at 1:50 PM
People's attitudes to the future differ — from "No future" to "Tomorrow is simply today – only tomorrow." What about in health-state valuation? I find no simple discounting model fits the data. Don't put reading the paper off until tomorrow: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
We could all use more sensitivity—especially when it comes to delicate matters like severe health issues or death. The composite time trade-off method could, too! For ideas on how to enhance its sensitivity, check out: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Making Composite Time Trade-Off Sensitive for Worse-than-Dead Health States - PharmacoEconomics
Objective The utilities elicited with the composite time trade-off (cTTO) method for health states worse-than-dead (WTD) often correlate poorly with other severity measures, indicating a poor sensitiv...
link.springer.com
February 26, 2025 at 12:14 PM
We could all use more sensitivity—especially when it comes to delicate matters like severe health issues or death. The composite time trade-off method could, too! For ideas on how to enhance its sensitivity, check out: link.springer.com/article/10.1...