Patrik Michaelsen
@michaelsen.bsky.social
Post doc in political science University of Gothenburg.
Behavioral public policy, conservation policy, transparency, behavior change, open science
www.patrikmichaelsen.com
Behavioral public policy, conservation policy, transparency, behavior change, open science
www.patrikmichaelsen.com
A second experiment on domestic-level policy regimes shows similar, but somewhat more diverse, results across countries.
Results include a widespread preferences of protected areas that prioritize nature values (even over social or economic), and general dislike of funding PAs through general taxes
Results include a widespread preferences of protected areas that prioritize nature values (even over social or economic), and general dislike of funding PAs through general taxes
September 1, 2025 at 10:05 AM
A second experiment on domestic-level policy regimes shows similar, but somewhat more diverse, results across countries.
Results include a widespread preferences of protected areas that prioritize nature values (even over social or economic), and general dislike of funding PAs through general taxes
Results include a widespread preferences of protected areas that prioritize nature values (even over social or economic), and general dislike of funding PAs through general taxes
Experimentally, we find highly consistent policy preferences for international-level expansion regimes.
Results include widespread preferences for rich countries bearing higher costs, and generally that each country should protect 30% (instead of e.g., according to conservation benefits)
Results include widespread preferences for rich countries bearing higher costs, and generally that each country should protect 30% (instead of e.g., according to conservation benefits)
September 1, 2025 at 10:05 AM
Experimentally, we find highly consistent policy preferences for international-level expansion regimes.
Results include widespread preferences for rich countries bearing higher costs, and generally that each country should protect 30% (instead of e.g., according to conservation benefits)
Results include widespread preferences for rich countries bearing higher costs, and generally that each country should protect 30% (instead of e.g., according to conservation benefits)
We find 30x30 support levels in the range of 80-90% for Argentina, Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa and Spain samples.
Swedish (66% in favor) and USA (71%) respondents show strong majority support, albeit at comparatively lower levels.
Swedish (66% in favor) and USA (71%) respondents show strong majority support, albeit at comparatively lower levels.
September 1, 2025 at 10:05 AM
We find 30x30 support levels in the range of 80-90% for Argentina, Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa and Spain samples.
Swedish (66% in favor) and USA (71%) respondents show strong majority support, albeit at comparatively lower levels.
Swedish (66% in favor) and USA (71%) respondents show strong majority support, albeit at comparatively lower levels.