What does “good” coverage of AI mean to you? I wrote about how the disparate views that very smart people have about existential risk are making it hard to calibrate how to cover advancements in artificial intelligence.

https://www.platformer.news/p/why-im-having-trouble-covering-ai

Jordan Neely’s last words were about how jail was easier than a city starved of a safety net w/extortionate costs of living.

And leaders can’t say whether killing him was wrong or not.

Why? Because he was hungry and told the truth? They’ve given 0 explanation as to what makes this so “complicated”