Michael E. Mann
@michaelemann.bsky.social
Scientist/Author/Speaker; Presidential Distinguished Prof/Director Center for Science, Sustainability & the Media, U. Penn; National Academy of Sciences; Royal Society; Tyler Prize
No worries — thanks for engaging! 🙂
November 10, 2025 at 11:46 PM
No worries — thanks for engaging! 🙂
Reposted by Michael E. Mann
The Dems who didn’t stick together are the 8 (including King, technically an independent) who joined with Republicans to block ACA benefits.
November 10, 2025 at 8:35 PM
The Dems who didn’t stick together are the 8 (including King, technically an independent) who joined with Republicans to block ACA benefits.
The Dems who didn’t stick together are the 8 (including King, technically an independent) who joined with Republicans to block ACA benefits.
November 10, 2025 at 8:35 PM
The Dems who didn’t stick together are the 8 (including King, technically an independent) who joined with Republicans to block ACA benefits.
I certainly agree on that last one.
November 10, 2025 at 5:41 PM
I certainly agree on that last one.
oh, could be. That's the problem w/ satire and irony on social media. Poe's Law in action...
November 10, 2025 at 5:29 PM
oh, could be. That's the problem w/ satire and irony on social media. Poe's Law in action...
Reposted by Michael E. Mann
people will die because of this. That's pretty catastrophic--for them and their loved ones.
November 10, 2025 at 5:19 PM
people will die because of this. That's pretty catastrophic--for them and their loved ones.
people will die because of this. That's pretty catastrophic--for them and their loved ones.
November 10, 2025 at 5:19 PM
people will die because of this. That's pretty catastrophic--for them and their loved ones.
Reposted by Michael E. Mann
yep--super disappointed in @kaine.senate.gov
November 10, 2025 at 5:14 PM
yep--super disappointed in @kaine.senate.gov
yep--super disappointed in @kaine.senate.gov
November 10, 2025 at 5:14 PM
yep--super disappointed in @kaine.senate.gov
Reposted by Michael E. Mann
but now those WON'T be "owned by the Republicans". The Republicans can credibly claim there was "bi-partisan" support, and our compromised media will parrot their talking points.
November 10, 2025 at 5:01 PM
but now those WON'T be "owned by the Republicans". The Republicans can credibly claim there was "bi-partisan" support, and our compromised media will parrot their talking points.
but now those WON'T be "owned by the Republicans". The Republicans can credibly claim there was "bi-partisan" support, and our compromised media will parrot their talking points.
November 10, 2025 at 5:01 PM
but now those WON'T be "owned by the Republicans". The Republicans can credibly claim there was "bi-partisan" support, and our compromised media will parrot their talking points.
Reposted by Michael E. Mann
are you kidding me! He's minority leader. He whipped his caucus on this, knew exactly how many votes were needed, and what result he wanted. He then insulted us by using his own nominal "no" vote as a shield. Pathetic!
November 10, 2025 at 4:23 PM
are you kidding me! He's minority leader. He whipped his caucus on this, knew exactly how many votes were needed, and what result he wanted. He then insulted us by using his own nominal "no" vote as a shield. Pathetic!
Reposted by Michael E. Mann
Don't be done with the party. In a two party system where one party is trying to destroy the planet, there is no other choice. But DEMAND NEW LEADERSHIP.
November 10, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Don't be done with the party. In a two party system where one party is trying to destroy the planet, there is no other choice. But DEMAND NEW LEADERSHIP.
Don't be done with the party. In a two party system where one party is trying to destroy the planet, there is no other choice. But DEMAND NEW LEADERSHIP.
November 10, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Don't be done with the party. In a two party system where one party is trying to destroy the planet, there is no other choice. But DEMAND NEW LEADERSHIP.
are you kidding me! He's minority leader. He whipped his caucus on this, knew exactly how many votes were needed, and what result he wanted. He then insulted us by using his own nominal "no" vote as a shield. Pathetic!
November 10, 2025 at 4:23 PM
are you kidding me! He's minority leader. He whipped his caucus on this, knew exactly how many votes were needed, and what result he wanted. He then insulted us by using his own nominal "no" vote as a shield. Pathetic!