Wow “…..The court found the directive illegible, legally unsupported, factually inaccurate and focused on race in ways that were constitutionally impermissible.

“It’s challenging to unpack the DOJ Letter because it contains so many factual, legal, and typographical errors,” the judges wrote. “

Im sure SCOTUS will intervene and clear the TX maps, but wouldnt be the funniest thing is Texas changes were thrown out and California changes stayed in.

what about the DoJ? Should he maybe ask Ag Bondi to release them?

yes, im sure Ag Bondi will get right on that.

No Piorogis

Another Profile in Courage

sounds like when i did genealogy research on my family. Do you know how many Patrick Murphy's there are ?

They might have their ear closer to the ground with the MAGA crowd. But also they are up for reeelction next year and being know for blocking release of Epstein files at last minute may not go over well.

My thinking was that it was during Trumos first term, which was years after he cut ties with Epstein.

President, even one like Trump, isn’t going to show up at Epsteins house w/o Secret service and habe someone else just walk in because they have the door code.

I’m thinking it was a sarcastic joke reference to past years ?

Answer doesn’t refer to Trump at all, just mechanics to get it.

And why do people think this is a victim? it’s more private ? Sounds like a guy coming in from NY to have sex at Epsteinsl