Maggie Harrison Dupré
@mharrisondupre.bsky.social
Award-winning journalist at Futurism covering AI and its impacts on media, information, and people. Send tips by email to: maggie@futurism.com or Signal: mhd.39
Similar one here:
November 4, 2025 at 8:23 PM
Similar one here:
I’m assembling a team
November 3, 2025 at 7:11 PM
I’m assembling a team
Here's CAI's CEO, in August, telling Wired that he wasn't worried about users viewing the platform's anthropomorphic chatbots as anything other than "entertainment," because the platform's disclaimers were doing all of the necessary heavy-lifting:
www.wired.com/story/charac...
www.wired.com/story/charac...
October 29, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Here's CAI's CEO, in August, telling Wired that he wasn't worried about users viewing the platform's anthropomorphic chatbots as anything other than "entertainment," because the platform's disclaimers were doing all of the necessary heavy-lifting:
www.wired.com/story/charac...
www.wired.com/story/charac...
CAI cites its reading of "news reports" and hearing concerns from experts and regulators about minors and AI safety as cause for the change. It does *not* mention that it's fighting several lawsuits alleging that its chatbots drove multiple teens to self-harm and death:
October 29, 2025 at 4:49 PM
CAI cites its reading of "news reports" and hearing concerns from experts and regulators about minors and AI safety as cause for the change. It does *not* mention that it's fighting several lawsuits alleging that its chatbots drove multiple teens to self-harm and death:
Thanks Alex!!
October 22, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Thanks Alex!!
There is some fascinating cross-aisle consensus happening here, though, that I think is noteworthy. As it turns out, the idea that Silicon Valley should race to build society-destabilizing superintelligent AI without clear regulation, oversight, or democratic public buy-in is pretty unpopular!!!
October 22, 2025 at 1:11 PM
There is some fascinating cross-aisle consensus happening here, though, that I think is noteworthy. As it turns out, the idea that Silicon Valley should race to build society-destabilizing superintelligent AI without clear regulation, oversight, or democratic public buy-in is pretty unpopular!!!
I tend to be pretty skeptical of letters like this (there have been a few now!)
And visions of superintelligence aside, the reality is that generative AI — in its current, not-superintelligent form — is causing harm and chaos right now:
And visions of superintelligence aside, the reality is that generative AI — in its current, not-superintelligent form — is causing harm and chaos right now:
October 22, 2025 at 12:57 PM
I tend to be pretty skeptical of letters like this (there have been a few now!)
And visions of superintelligence aside, the reality is that generative AI — in its current, not-superintelligent form — is causing harm and chaos right now:
And visions of superintelligence aside, the reality is that generative AI — in its current, not-superintelligent form — is causing harm and chaos right now: