MAGA rallies around subjective grievances and "needs" that really don't benefit them in an objective sense at all. Dems need to focus on tangible, objective impact of Trump policies and hammer home to people that those things do absolutely nothing for them.

Pritzker, or whoever becomes the lead spokespeople for the Dems, need to focus on what I think is an effective addition to his message: ask people "how does [insert thing Trump is doing] objectively help you?"

I'm as indifferent and uninterested as one can get in the NFL draft and Sanders, but attending a Lakers game for a few hours, at a time the team probably wouldn't have been studying film is an odd thing to slight him for.

Now that's what I call a warfighter... 😄

Nobody who suddenly sees RFK Jr. as their North Star to guide them to an understanding of what causes autism had any idea who he was before last year when he was sucking up to Trump seeking relevance.

We are all allowed to criticize appearance when the appearance is the result of choices that could have been avoided.

The glib performative theatrics by the men that table...

How much of one's own dignity does one lose when they laugh at everything he says?

We would be remiss if we did not remind people that this man is worth $3.2 billion.

I wonder what mountain they'll be doing the mining in?

Hideous. Just hideous, and a dark reminder of early childhood daycare.

It really begs the question: what would they be saying if it were right-wing journalist they respected who brought this to the public's attention? Same tune? Same smears? Same hyperbole?

Exactly. Bring them in from Obama's administration, GWB's, and Clinton's. Get their answers, and ask this current crew "how does this not apply to your situation?"

Help me out: if someone doesn't want an "activist" judge that leans liberal, and instead wants a judge that leans completely conservative, who will do exactly what they want, how is that judge not also an activist judge?

Ever listen to a morning radio show and notice how often they get a fact or a reference wrong?

I think a lot of Congress is like that: well-intentioned, but painfully limited in time to focus and deliver consistently cogent thoughts.