Din Djarin
@meurik.bsky.social
Ugh... yeah, the old one was *not* pretty. It should definitely be hauled away *as* garbage. Vast improvement on the new one.
October 20, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Ugh... yeah, the old one was *not* pretty. It should definitely be hauled away *as* garbage. Vast improvement on the new one.
Could you post a comparison between the hold Negh'Tev and the new one?
September 23, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Could you post a comparison between the hold Negh'Tev and the new one?
When has Bonespurs Don ever cared about obeying the law?
September 2, 2025 at 8:25 PM
When has Bonespurs Don ever cared about obeying the law?
The only future you deserve, is the one behind bars along with your MAGA friends.
If you don't invoke the 25th Amendment with the cabinet, and rid the United States of the Tango Terror, you're as guilty as he is.
If you don't invoke the 25th Amendment with the cabinet, and rid the United States of the Tango Terror, you're as guilty as he is.
July 16, 2025 at 6:02 PM
The only future you deserve, is the one behind bars along with your MAGA friends.
If you don't invoke the 25th Amendment with the cabinet, and rid the United States of the Tango Terror, you're as guilty as he is.
If you don't invoke the 25th Amendment with the cabinet, and rid the United States of the Tango Terror, you're as guilty as he is.
Don't show this to the orange con man... 😁
April 23, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Don't show this to the orange con man... 😁
LOCK HIM UP!!! Impeach the motherf---er, and throw the book at him.
April 14, 2025 at 9:38 PM
LOCK HIM UP!!! Impeach the motherf---er, and throw the book at him.
No doubt they'll TRY. Either way, we know he'll violate the US Constitution. He's done it before.
January 17, 2025 at 8:25 PM
No doubt they'll TRY. Either way, we know he'll violate the US Constitution. He's done it before.
Unless he and the GOP violate the Constitution, there are no more inaugurations after this one. He can't run a 3rd term.
No doubt, he'll end up declaring permanent Martial Law on Jan 19th, 2029. And MAGA:ts will think that's perfectly acceptable.
No doubt, he'll end up declaring permanent Martial Law on Jan 19th, 2029. And MAGA:ts will think that's perfectly acceptable.
January 17, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Unless he and the GOP violate the Constitution, there are no more inaugurations after this one. He can't run a 3rd term.
No doubt, he'll end up declaring permanent Martial Law on Jan 19th, 2029. And MAGA:ts will think that's perfectly acceptable.
No doubt, he'll end up declaring permanent Martial Law on Jan 19th, 2029. And MAGA:ts will think that's perfectly acceptable.
Trump refused to go the D-Day ceremony as well when he was President, on account of ... RAIN! And you call Democrats/Liberals "snowflakes" ? Trump is the biggest snowflake of them all.
January 17, 2025 at 7:05 PM
Trump refused to go the D-Day ceremony as well when he was President, on account of ... RAIN! And you call Democrats/Liberals "snowflakes" ? Trump is the biggest snowflake of them all.
Also, Teddy Rafael Cruz, really has no say in the matter here. When his constituents were freezing their asses off because of Texas mismangement, Rafey fled to Cancun on... "Vacation"
January 16, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Also, Teddy Rafael Cruz, really has no say in the matter here. When his constituents were freezing their asses off because of Texas mismangement, Rafey fled to Cancun on... "Vacation"
Supreme Court handed the Presidency "carte blanche" to do whatever it wants, so long as you can paint it as an OFFICIAL ACT.
Executive Orders might not as easily be overturned in the future.
Executive Orders might not as easily be overturned in the future.
January 10, 2025 at 9:54 PM
Supreme Court handed the Presidency "carte blanche" to do whatever it wants, so long as you can paint it as an OFFICIAL ACT.
Executive Orders might not as easily be overturned in the future.
Executive Orders might not as easily be overturned in the future.
Sentence or no sentence, this will tell every would-be criminal in existence, that all you have to do to escape punishment, is run for President.
Trump deserves life in prison. Not the office/title of "President".
Trump deserves life in prison. Not the office/title of "President".
January 10, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Sentence or no sentence, this will tell every would-be criminal in existence, that all you have to do to escape punishment, is run for President.
Trump deserves life in prison. Not the office/title of "President".
Trump deserves life in prison. Not the office/title of "President".
No he doesn't. Because Merchan committed no crimes. TRUMP did. And he will forever be a Convicted Felon, no matter what MAGA thinks of "dear leader", the Mango Mussolini.
January 10, 2025 at 3:54 PM
No he doesn't. Because Merchan committed no crimes. TRUMP did. And he will forever be a Convicted Felon, no matter what MAGA thinks of "dear leader", the Mango Mussolini.
Thought Republicans were opposed to "Cancel culture" ?
Yet they seem to engage in it more often.
Yet they seem to engage in it more often.
January 4, 2025 at 9:46 PM
Thought Republicans were opposed to "Cancel culture" ?
Yet they seem to engage in it more often.
Yet they seem to engage in it more often.
Also find it ironic, that one of the biggest spreaders of fake news and negativity on X (Musk himself), should want to curb the spread of negativity...
Hint: Maybe stop posting negativity that is amplified by your multi-million followers?
Hint: Maybe stop posting negativity that is amplified by your multi-million followers?
January 4, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Also find it ironic, that one of the biggest spreaders of fake news and negativity on X (Musk himself), should want to curb the spread of negativity...
Hint: Maybe stop posting negativity that is amplified by your multi-million followers?
Hint: Maybe stop posting negativity that is amplified by your multi-million followers?
She lost the election, did she not? I should not have to answer rhetorical questions.
On the subject of emails, for Trump's 4 years, both he and his immediate family used non-government issued devices to conduct official busines from. Should they not be subject to the same as Hillary?
On the subject of emails, for Trump's 4 years, both he and his immediate family used non-government issued devices to conduct official busines from. Should they not be subject to the same as Hillary?
January 3, 2025 at 10:53 PM
She lost the election, did she not? I should not have to answer rhetorical questions.
On the subject of emails, for Trump's 4 years, both he and his immediate family used non-government issued devices to conduct official busines from. Should they not be subject to the same as Hillary?
On the subject of emails, for Trump's 4 years, both he and his immediate family used non-government issued devices to conduct official busines from. Should they not be subject to the same as Hillary?
Comey, Comer... easy to get it wrong (I covfefe'd !!!)
Who's laptop did the emails end up on? Also it's funny you mention sex offender, when we're discussing Trump as well (who was convicted/liable for sexual assault vs E Jean Carroll).
Who's laptop did the emails end up on? Also it's funny you mention sex offender, when we're discussing Trump as well (who was convicted/liable for sexual assault vs E Jean Carroll).
January 3, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Comey, Comer... easy to get it wrong (I covfefe'd !!!)
Who's laptop did the emails end up on? Also it's funny you mention sex offender, when we're discussing Trump as well (who was convicted/liable for sexual assault vs E Jean Carroll).
Who's laptop did the emails end up on? Also it's funny you mention sex offender, when we're discussing Trump as well (who was convicted/liable for sexual assault vs E Jean Carroll).
"Weakest position" can be debated.
In 2016, Hillary was leading in all the polls over Trump. Then a few weeks before the election, Comer announced an investigation into her emails (which went nowhere), which led voters to believe Trump was the better option (Hint: he wasn't)
In 2016, Hillary was leading in all the polls over Trump. Then a few weeks before the election, Comer announced an investigation into her emails (which went nowhere), which led voters to believe Trump was the better option (Hint: he wasn't)
January 3, 2025 at 10:39 PM
"Weakest position" can be debated.
In 2016, Hillary was leading in all the polls over Trump. Then a few weeks before the election, Comer announced an investigation into her emails (which went nowhere), which led voters to believe Trump was the better option (Hint: he wasn't)
In 2016, Hillary was leading in all the polls over Trump. Then a few weeks before the election, Comer announced an investigation into her emails (which went nowhere), which led voters to believe Trump was the better option (Hint: he wasn't)
Read up on Federal Supremacy. Any individual state, is powerless to arrest a sitting President.
January 3, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Read up on Federal Supremacy. Any individual state, is powerless to arrest a sitting President.
Debatable. I was responding to your "approval rating" argument, in which both Clinton and Obama had far higher ratings than either Bush, Trump or Biden.
Obama had 60+ months of job growth and a strong economy, which Trump rode on for most of his term.
Obama had 60+ months of job growth and a strong economy, which Trump rode on for most of his term.
January 3, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Debatable. I was responding to your "approval rating" argument, in which both Clinton and Obama had far higher ratings than either Bush, Trump or Biden.
Obama had 60+ months of job growth and a strong economy, which Trump rode on for most of his term.
Obama had 60+ months of job growth and a strong economy, which Trump rode on for most of his term.
Because it would be the DOJ ultimately responsible, to make sure he goes to prison (if sentenced to jail time). State law enforcement would have no jurisdiction to arrest the President.
January 3, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Because it would be the DOJ ultimately responsible, to make sure he goes to prison (if sentenced to jail time). State law enforcement would have no jurisdiction to arrest the President.
Fun Fact: Trump *also* had a 34% approval rating when he left office in 2021. You know who had the highest in the past 30 years?
Clinton at 66%, followed by Obama at 59%.
Clinton at 66%, followed by Obama at 59%.
January 3, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Fun Fact: Trump *also* had a 34% approval rating when he left office in 2021. You know who had the highest in the past 30 years?
Clinton at 66%, followed by Obama at 59%.
Clinton at 66%, followed by Obama at 59%.
If he manages to get it moved to a Federal court, then the DOJ policy comes into play.
Either way, a jail sentence could still be in his future, just not enforcable until Jan 20th 2029, 12:01 PM.
Either way, a jail sentence could still be in his future, just not enforcable until Jan 20th 2029, 12:01 PM.
January 3, 2025 at 10:28 PM
If he manages to get it moved to a Federal court, then the DOJ policy comes into play.
Either way, a jail sentence could still be in his future, just not enforcable until Jan 20th 2029, 12:01 PM.
Either way, a jail sentence could still be in his future, just not enforcable until Jan 20th 2029, 12:01 PM.
Dubya was at 34% when he left office. Approval rating isn't really a metric that you can use as fact whether someone is a good or bad President.
I'm sure 99% of Republicans think Biden is the worst President ever. I'm also certain 99% of Democrats think Trump is the worst.
I'm sure 99% of Republicans think Biden is the worst President ever. I'm also certain 99% of Democrats think Trump is the worst.
January 3, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Dubya was at 34% when he left office. Approval rating isn't really a metric that you can use as fact whether someone is a good or bad President.
I'm sure 99% of Republicans think Biden is the worst President ever. I'm also certain 99% of Democrats think Trump is the worst.
I'm sure 99% of Republicans think Biden is the worst President ever. I'm also certain 99% of Democrats think Trump is the worst.