🏳️‍⚧️
mercurye.bsky.social
🏳️‍⚧️
@mercurye.bsky.social
🔞 (24). Black. Autistic. She/her. ΘΔ&
Reposted by 🏳️‍⚧️
it’s actually more shameful than a traditional gambling addiction, because at least with a gambling addiction there’s the chance of winning from time to time.
November 27, 2025 at 3:18 AM
Reposted by 🏳️‍⚧️
womp womp too bad I like my tits and curves and tummy as a tboy still a guy no matter what
November 29, 2025 at 1:27 AM
Reposted by 🏳️‍⚧️
i need some of yall to take a deep breath and remind yourself that people saying "no, this is useless and here's why people can't/shouldn't opt in" are not "3-cue readers" & you not feeling annoyed at another useless-at-best security-risk-at-worst feature is not because you're smarter than everyone
November 19, 2025 at 1:56 AM
Reposted by 🏳️‍⚧️
the less PII you can give to any given social media website, the better. there's no reason to voluntarily give more PII to the guys who very very demonstrably cannot be trusted with managing this website safely. no one asked for this feature.
November 19, 2025 at 1:40 AM
Reposted by 🏳️‍⚧️
"but they said it's double opt-in!"

and i am telling you it is a security risk to opt in, so you shouldn't do that. this website demonstrably gives info to the feds. instead of developing a new useless security risk no one asked for, give us safety features
November 19, 2025 at 1:34 AM
Reposted by 🏳️‍⚧️
the ability to private/lock your account is a basic safety feature that would have occurred to this website's libertarian genAI ghoul developers if they ever gave one wet fart about trust and safety, but hey instead let's introduce another possible vector of privacy danger
November 19, 2025 at 1:27 AM