Definitely worth pointing out in response, and even reporting if "no ai" is part of the review policy (not sure if this is paper or grant...)

Yes!! I've signed up to help with open day on Saturday so I can be 100% sure that Monday next week will be very confusing!!

Yes! I usually start chasing at 5 or 6 months wait

While I thought it was much longer, my data says longest was 9 months (the revised version then took another 7 months, hence my recollection of a long wait); shortest 3 weeks. Median (N=36) is 3 months

Look at that weird joint asymmetry - caused us a bit of a headache!!

I agree indeed that the CV and capacity to deliver are not the same thing and hence CV (narrative or not) is not useful. The fact that in TFS, the section for narrative CV is called "applicant and team capability to deliver", is laughable

Interesting view. I've seen the opportunity in a narrative CV (writing and reviewing) to tailor information, providing specific evidence of the capacity to deliver a project (highlighting aspects of experience which is not obvious to state in a traditional CV) alongside being a broad researcher.

Late welcome from me!

I missed Tom's unfortunately but Kay presented some great data on subsidence!!

Tagging @britspine.bsky.social ! Little #biomechanics this year but a great programme nevertheless

On the same story, crosscountry trains are very poorly designed: I always end up with terrible upper back pain when I travel with them!!!

Thanks for the inclusion. Could consider adding @sophie-williams.bsky.social

Sooo many people!