memphis11.bsky.social
memphis11.bsky.social
memphis11.bsky.social
@memphis11.bsky.social
One would be inclusion other would be reaching some consensus and provision of that outside the more restricted channels of communication
July 21, 2025 at 4:39 PM
More reach based on partisanship
July 21, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Like I take zines are a thing still but how is that different from larger gc now
July 21, 2025 at 4:31 PM
My assumption is they basically believe trying to generate interest (alot to work with with Trump) is too close to "metoo" and therefore bad.
July 21, 2025 at 1:11 PM
So true
July 20, 2025 at 8:38 PM
I kind of wonder if there should be a nuetral value in districts should be broken up if drawing them yields ~+23 expectations, however as to what you implement with that...
July 20, 2025 at 3:02 PM
I mean there is real pain point where progressives do in fact want dominant control of the party brand/decisions and orient themselves to do so. Personally I think they'll run into a congressional math problem that allows GOP control but would be successful in replacing more mod congressmembers
July 20, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Assume that's why she didn't go with the not dissimilar position that Israel should not receive military aid but should be able to purchase some subset of defensive weapons.
July 19, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Sincerely, try "caring" like 50% less about this topic the world will keep spinning and you'll be fine...
July 19, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Iirc he thinks using regulatory apparatus to ban fossil technology is similar to a carbon tax in that it will make people angry but a carbon tax is a better policy choice. Trying to point out a contradiction in logic ig
July 19, 2025 at 11:32 AM
Yea one difficulty on procedural tea reading is it's difficult to know the details or where to find that information.
July 18, 2025 at 8:12 PM
That and the shorter term consequences wrt welfare programs are real. I think the socially derived trends can change in 20 years so why worry about century level projections argument would sound better if the aforementioned wasn't there
July 18, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Tbh I think it's an ask to not be attacked for insufficient advocacy (or insufficiency as malace) based on language/communication as much as it is about use of specific words.
July 18, 2025 at 1:46 PM
Many people are saying
July 17, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Does it have deeper meaning besides domestically sourced weapons?
July 17, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Yea my blind expectation would be a directional change, low starting point but still...
July 17, 2025 at 9:43 PM
He is like technically correct that mitigation of gerrymandering with offsetting gerrymandering is not a good equilibrium, I can think of a worse one that involves slightly less gerrymandering on one side lol (but also why the threat is good actually)
July 17, 2025 at 3:33 AM
Forgot about that Ford/CATL factory
July 17, 2025 at 3:03 AM
Would that be difficult to do (write down a prescriptive circumstance), I guess the determination could be delegated?
July 16, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Wonder if there will be an uptick the in phrase "bond vigilantes"
July 16, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Solace in those that may have the opportunity to bind may also fall into a upside down mountain of their own hallucinations
July 15, 2025 at 7:59 PM
I think it has the potential to fracture coalitions in a not small online subset way, however this was overwhelming dictated by right-wing participation
July 15, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Another way to put this is please demonstrate your Clown Car can fit the needed seats
July 15, 2025 at 6:53 PM
"Now is the time" breaks my brain a little bit on how things change...
July 15, 2025 at 6:02 PM