That would be a good point if only one side had that vision but China has the same zero sum game as the us now it just depends who has a better show of force to win 21st century world order again it’s not fact but my opinion.

Your wrong interfering heavily in the Russia Ukraine war would truly start ww3 because there is no way Russia is gonna take it face down but here the us has a lot to gain and not much to lose china was taking oil from there and if the us controls it or has a say in where the oil goes it weakens chi.

If they wanted to go to war they would have likely found another reason to get it started

It doesn’t but this establishes it in a unique and powerful way china and Russia were getting everything they wanted in there so the us came in a showed will also take a fair share.

So it seems your ok with all the actions the us does around the world so why are you so enraged by just one more military capture it’s routine

From what I remember ww1 was started because of the prince Ferdinand assassination by a lone gunman not military action I don’t see where that compares to this situation here

Try positing it and report to me when you get banned (you won’t)

I think this was necessary because it shows the us is not a lame duck I don’t think the us has to wait till china escalates we are allowed to be first I think escalation is going to happen regardless at some point in the future.

Your argument is basically that only because of what judt happened countries will arm up and start thinking of war and be careless about international law my point is that that is true but it has nothing to do with the maduro arrest this all happened before because china and its allies don’t care

They already broke it more the once especially regarding Venezuela my point is simply the world order is already being broken by our adversaries we don’t need to be the goddie goodies here and adhere to laws that they don’t care about it’s either everyone or no one.

So let’s just be the good guys and and wait till china etc. does something or we can be smart and show that if international law is not adhered to by part of the world we won’t adhere to it either it’s all or nothing in this zero sum world.

The mentality was never changed in theory the u.s. just joined an already existing mentality adhered to by china russia North Korea and so on…..

Unnecessary alarmism

Lol

Closest to such a concept never wrote its fully adhered to total free speech this article make allegations that can’t be verified

Free. - Not under the control or power of another; independent.

Speech. - The expression of or ability to express thoughts and feelings by spoken words.

Twitter seems to b the closest to such a concept.

Like how?