@megatonmike.bsky.social
It’s ok, he lives. He’s coming back to play Dr doom in the next die hard/mcu fusion
December 26, 2025 at 2:54 AM
It’s ok, he lives. He’s coming back to play Dr doom in the next die hard/mcu fusion
The Last Unicorn does not approve
December 24, 2025 at 11:53 PM
The Last Unicorn does not approve
*more mutually exclusive
December 24, 2025 at 10:03 PM
*more mutually exclusive
Dude is moving near the speed of light, he’s going to be massive regardless. Skinny and jolly seem somewhat less mutually exclusive.
The smiling Buddha is the fat one.
The smiling Buddha is the fat one.
December 24, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Dude is moving near the speed of light, he’s going to be massive regardless. Skinny and jolly seem somewhat less mutually exclusive.
The smiling Buddha is the fat one.
The smiling Buddha is the fat one.
And then apply that same standard to military funding? And farmers? And police departments?
December 24, 2025 at 6:54 AM
And then apply that same standard to military funding? And farmers? And police departments?
Really have to “both sides” this shit in the last sentence?
December 23, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Really have to “both sides” this shit in the last sentence?
Does every action to cover up or conceal a crime, alone or in a conspiracy, reset the statute of limitations for the prosecution of the original crime?
December 21, 2025 at 9:21 AM
Does every action to cover up or conceal a crime, alone or in a conspiracy, reset the statute of limitations for the prosecution of the original crime?
I don’t see you offering a solution yourself…
This is a conversation the Democratic Party needs to have.
Unless you like what we have now?
Don’t hate the messenger, it’s just game theory.
It brings me no joy to point this out
This is a conversation the Democratic Party needs to have.
Unless you like what we have now?
Don’t hate the messenger, it’s just game theory.
It brings me no joy to point this out
December 19, 2025 at 10:33 PM
I don’t see you offering a solution yourself…
This is a conversation the Democratic Party needs to have.
Unless you like what we have now?
Don’t hate the messenger, it’s just game theory.
It brings me no joy to point this out
This is a conversation the Democratic Party needs to have.
Unless you like what we have now?
Don’t hate the messenger, it’s just game theory.
It brings me no joy to point this out
No, the answer is ranked choice voting. Unless you see an easy way to reduce racism and sexism in America? Michelle Obama said it herself on nov 5.
Don’t misread me, I’d love to see a woman president.
I’d also love to see an atheist president, would I suggest running one? Fuck no, they’d never win.
Don’t misread me, I’d love to see a woman president.
I’d also love to see an atheist president, would I suggest running one? Fuck no, they’d never win.
December 19, 2025 at 10:21 PM
No, the answer is ranked choice voting. Unless you see an easy way to reduce racism and sexism in America? Michelle Obama said it herself on nov 5.
Don’t misread me, I’d love to see a woman president.
I’d also love to see an atheist president, would I suggest running one? Fuck no, they’d never win.
Don’t misread me, I’d love to see a woman president.
I’d also love to see an atheist president, would I suggest running one? Fuck no, they’d never win.
And the answer is ranked voice voting
December 19, 2025 at 7:15 PM
And the answer is ranked voice voting
Sadly, being a good person, a potentially better president, or having solid principles is not enough.
For example, a nonpartisan voting commission as a fight against gerrymandering is in principle good. But then only democratic states do it and unilaterally disarm.
This behavior loses the game
For example, a nonpartisan voting commission as a fight against gerrymandering is in principle good. But then only democratic states do it and unilaterally disarm.
This behavior loses the game
December 19, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Sadly, being a good person, a potentially better president, or having solid principles is not enough.
For example, a nonpartisan voting commission as a fight against gerrymandering is in principle good. But then only democratic states do it and unilaterally disarm.
This behavior loses the game
For example, a nonpartisan voting commission as a fight against gerrymandering is in principle good. But then only democratic states do it and unilaterally disarm.
This behavior loses the game
You dont know me, how I vote or understand a simple argument, I never said any of that.
“You’re not ready for a woman, you are not.” -Michelle Obama Nov 5 2025
Care to argue with me
Or Michelle?
“You’re not ready for a woman, you are not.” -Michelle Obama Nov 5 2025
Care to argue with me
Or Michelle?
December 19, 2025 at 9:55 AM
You dont know me, how I vote or understand a simple argument, I never said any of that.
“You’re not ready for a woman, you are not.” -Michelle Obama Nov 5 2025
Care to argue with me
Or Michelle?
“You’re not ready for a woman, you are not.” -Michelle Obama Nov 5 2025
Care to argue with me
Or Michelle?
No need to argue on this, we’re on the same side. But to argue that electability is not an argument for or against a candidate is political malpractice. I’ll be voting for who can actually win.
You seem kinda angry that racism and sexism exist and some of them vote. You’re misdirecting that at me
You seem kinda angry that racism and sexism exist and some of them vote. You’re misdirecting that at me
December 19, 2025 at 9:42 AM
No need to argue on this, we’re on the same side. But to argue that electability is not an argument for or against a candidate is political malpractice. I’ll be voting for who can actually win.
You seem kinda angry that racism and sexism exist and some of them vote. You’re misdirecting that at me
You seem kinda angry that racism and sexism exist and some of them vote. You’re misdirecting that at me
Oh ya, it was easy to say, because it’s true, at least statistically. Overcoming electoral college, racism and sexism gives a candidate an automatic (estimate) 10 point deficit nationally.
Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see a woman president, but not at the expense of consistently losing.
Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see a woman president, but not at the expense of consistently losing.
December 19, 2025 at 9:18 AM
Oh ya, it was easy to say, because it’s true, at least statistically. Overcoming electoral college, racism and sexism gives a candidate an automatic (estimate) 10 point deficit nationally.
Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see a woman president, but not at the expense of consistently losing.
Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see a woman president, but not at the expense of consistently losing.
Don’t put words in my mouth, I argued none of those points.
Are you arguing that America is free of racism and sexism? I would argue that it is not.
Are you arguing that America is free of racism and sexism? I would argue that it is not.
December 19, 2025 at 8:59 AM
Don’t put words in my mouth, I argued none of those points.
Are you arguing that America is free of racism and sexism? I would argue that it is not.
Are you arguing that America is free of racism and sexism? I would argue that it is not.
She specifically said that as a main reason for why she wouldn’t run.
December 19, 2025 at 8:50 AM
She specifically said that as a main reason for why she wouldn’t run.
No shit! Watching it now, read you post and laughed. I forgot how well done it was. Engaging the whole series through
December 19, 2025 at 7:58 AM
No shit! Watching it now, read you post and laughed. I forgot how well done it was. Engaging the whole series through
Because we don’t have ranked choice voting
December 19, 2025 at 6:19 AM
Because we don’t have ranked choice voting
Well first off,
Dude had style.
I knew he was gonna win president since he did the key note for 2004 dnc.
But…
“…you’re not ready for a woman.You are not”- Michelle Obama nov 5, 2025
I suppose you could ask his wife if that weekens my argument?
Don’t hate the messenger
Dude had style.
I knew he was gonna win president since he did the key note for 2004 dnc.
But…
“…you’re not ready for a woman.You are not”- Michelle Obama nov 5, 2025
I suppose you could ask his wife if that weekens my argument?
Don’t hate the messenger
December 19, 2025 at 5:09 AM
Well first off,
Dude had style.
I knew he was gonna win president since he did the key note for 2004 dnc.
But…
“…you’re not ready for a woman.You are not”- Michelle Obama nov 5, 2025
I suppose you could ask his wife if that weekens my argument?
Don’t hate the messenger
Dude had style.
I knew he was gonna win president since he did the key note for 2004 dnc.
But…
“…you’re not ready for a woman.You are not”- Michelle Obama nov 5, 2025
I suppose you could ask his wife if that weekens my argument?
Don’t hate the messenger
Well, the worst people have what they want right now..
The question of “who would make the best president” and
“Who can win the presidency” are very, very different questions, Q.E.D.
Democrats are more idealistic and ask the former
Anyone tired of losing on principle?
Don’t hate the messenger
The question of “who would make the best president” and
“Who can win the presidency” are very, very different questions, Q.E.D.
Democrats are more idealistic and ask the former
Anyone tired of losing on principle?
Don’t hate the messenger
December 19, 2025 at 4:48 AM
Well, the worst people have what they want right now..
The question of “who would make the best president” and
“Who can win the presidency” are very, very different questions, Q.E.D.
Democrats are more idealistic and ask the former
Anyone tired of losing on principle?
Don’t hate the messenger
The question of “who would make the best president” and
“Who can win the presidency” are very, very different questions, Q.E.D.
Democrats are more idealistic and ask the former
Anyone tired of losing on principle?
Don’t hate the messenger
So…let’s recap:
White woman runs-wins popular loses electoral college
White guy runs- wins both
Black woman runs- loses both
Failure to acknowledge that we live in a country that is both sexist and racist dooms the Democrats to further losses.
This is simple game theory.
I wish it were not so
White woman runs-wins popular loses electoral college
White guy runs- wins both
Black woman runs- loses both
Failure to acknowledge that we live in a country that is both sexist and racist dooms the Democrats to further losses.
This is simple game theory.
I wish it were not so
December 18, 2025 at 11:37 PM
So…let’s recap:
White woman runs-wins popular loses electoral college
White guy runs- wins both
Black woman runs- loses both
Failure to acknowledge that we live in a country that is both sexist and racist dooms the Democrats to further losses.
This is simple game theory.
I wish it were not so
White woman runs-wins popular loses electoral college
White guy runs- wins both
Black woman runs- loses both
Failure to acknowledge that we live in a country that is both sexist and racist dooms the Democrats to further losses.
This is simple game theory.
I wish it were not so
Theory would be worthy if true, but the committee is very hesitant to reward astrophysics and cosmology. Hell, if general relativity didn’t get one…
December 14, 2025 at 10:00 AM
Theory would be worthy if true, but the committee is very hesitant to reward astrophysics and cosmology. Hell, if general relativity didn’t get one…