mdcmartinus.bsky.social
@mdcmartinus.bsky.social
You "forgot" to mention the German intelligence agency.
December 16, 2025 at 1:26 PM
It's highly plausible that the "recent" Luo et al. GoF study was based upon experiments performed before the pandemic, but that they shelved it for more than four years. They think it's now "safe" to come out with it, because people don't care, they hope. Indeed, here on BlueSky not many care...
November 30, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Would all these scientists be OK with experimenting with potentially dangerous chimeras in BSL-2 laboratories? I can't believe that. They should stand up now and speak out against it and the publication of it.
November 30, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Indeed.
November 30, 2025 at 10:44 AM
Reposted
yes, this looks like straight-up gain-of-function research in bat coronaviruses. Creating new recombinant viruses with potentially greater pathogenicity, and doing this under BSL-2 conditions which are not at all strict. And the Journal of Virology published it, unsurprising given their record
November 28, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Thanks for confirming.

So the Journal of Virology has a record of publishing this kind of unsafe GoF research?

What can be done about that?

I sent a complaint just out of principle, but of course, that won't change much.
November 29, 2025 at 1:21 PM
journals.asm.org
November 27, 2025 at 1:21 AM
Why is this considered to be "spam"??
November 27, 2025 at 1:17 AM
Immediately also blocked by Peter Daszak and Kristian Anderson. Impressively quick.
November 3, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Blocked by Flo Debarre, just seconds after posting this.
November 3, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Nonsense.

The lab leak theory is perfectly plausible. In fact, when viewed objectively, it is a much more likely explanation than the problematic market theory.
August 19, 2025 at 10:56 AM
Antoine Lavoisier, 1785:

“It is frightening to think that, in a large assembly, the air that each individual breathes has passed over and over again (…)through the lungs of all those present, and that it must have been charged with(…)putrid exhalations; but what is the nature of these emanations?”
August 19, 2025 at 9:43 AM
Also not mentioned in Airborne by @carlzimmer.com is John Scott Haldane (1860–1936), the great Scottish physicist. He pioneered systematic CO₂ monitoring in public buildings and cannot be dismissed as a miasmist.👇
August 19, 2025 at 9:33 AM
Benjamin Marten in 1720:
August 19, 2025 at 8:55 AM
Thanks! That's just the little push I needed to dig out some of the Bob Shaw books that I once bought in a second-hand bookshop!
August 19, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Great book indeed.

What I missed a bit were some important but forgotten scholars from the 18th century, like Benjamin Marten, William Hillary, John Haygarth,… who were on the right track to the truth of airborne transmission. The history is more complex than just miasma vs contagion.
August 19, 2025 at 8:16 AM