Which bit did you disagree with?
August 5, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Which bit did you disagree with?
Why are you in Brixton?
July 10, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Why are you in Brixton?
But the Equality Act is the foundational to discrimination law. And as regards other legislation, much of the same logic will generally apply such as words having their normal meaning.
April 25, 2025 at 3:10 PM
But the Equality Act is the foundational to discrimination law. And as regards other legislation, much of the same logic will generally apply such as words having their normal meaning.
Also Fiona Scolding KC, Naomi Cunningham, Sarah Phillimore, Sarah Vine KC.
April 16, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Also Fiona Scolding KC, Naomi Cunningham, Sarah Phillimore, Sarah Vine KC.
Personally, I would consider notions of decency to be a protected belief. They don’t have to be embedded in a religious belief although they often go together. But we irreligious also have deeply held beliefs about privacy.
April 16, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Personally, I would consider notions of decency to be a protected belief. They don’t have to be embedded in a religious belief although they often go together. But we irreligious also have deeply held beliefs about privacy.
Yes to the first line. As regards the second clause, much of the panic is also not manufactured but arises from the trauma and caution of the many women who have been personally harassed and assaulted, or whose friends have been. It also arises from religious beliefs and beliefs about decency.
April 16, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Yes to the first line. As regards the second clause, much of the panic is also not manufactured but arises from the trauma and caution of the many women who have been personally harassed and assaulted, or whose friends have been. It also arises from religious beliefs and beliefs about decency.
What is your solution?
April 16, 2025 at 2:57 PM
What is your solution?
Well until now people presumably had to carry their gender recognition certificates. But the court listed a raft of areas where the implications are more serious and in practice it’s the cases where people’s looks do not match their certification which are contentious.
April 16, 2025 at 11:26 AM
Well until now people presumably had to carry their gender recognition certificates. But the court listed a raft of areas where the implications are more serious and in practice it’s the cases where people’s looks do not match their certification which are contentious.
Now massively out of date, of course. And has been for some time. Hence a completely impractical and inaccurate guide.
April 16, 2025 at 11:16 AM
Now massively out of date, of course. And has been for some time. Hence a completely impractical and inaccurate guide.
Yes. They are not afraid of being assaulted by trans men.
April 16, 2025 at 11:13 AM
Yes. They are not afraid of being assaulted by trans men.
Fascinating. It would be really interesting to know more about how they compare and contrast on details like evidence and NDAs.
April 1, 2025 at 11:56 AM
Fascinating. It would be really interesting to know more about how they compare and contrast on details like evidence and NDAs.
And they are also a symbol of Christ , hence the use in stained glass windows, as in desperate times they were said to peck their chest to feed their chicks on their own body and blood.
February 11, 2025 at 4:59 AM
And they are also a symbol of Christ , hence the use in stained glass windows, as in desperate times they were said to peck their chest to feed their chicks on their own body and blood.
But why let the facts ruin a good story?
February 10, 2025 at 5:02 PM
But why let the facts ruin a good story?
I don’t understand this picture. Is she Sue Tonius?
February 5, 2025 at 5:39 AM
I don’t understand this picture. Is she Sue Tonius?
Shocking times we live in.
January 28, 2025 at 12:20 PM
Shocking times we live in.
And now, Robin, the decision on the preliminary point is out and the claimant is permitted to present her claim as she wishes, within reason.
January 27, 2025 at 8:21 PM
And now, Robin, the decision on the preliminary point is out and the claimant is permitted to present her claim as she wishes, within reason.
Hello, genuinely not meaning to be argumentative but struggling to understand why it would be okay to be remunerated for one task but not for each of two tasks. I mean, if the Archbishops Council find someone competent and diligent, why should they not seek their assistance with another task?
January 27, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Hello, genuinely not meaning to be argumentative but struggling to understand why it would be okay to be remunerated for one task but not for each of two tasks. I mean, if the Archbishops Council find someone competent and diligent, why should they not seek their assistance with another task?
Great to see the Lords asking the right questions, such as Lord Laming pointing out politely that the LAs are underfunded.
January 21, 2025 at 2:04 PM
Great to see the Lords asking the right questions, such as Lord Laming pointing out politely that the LAs are underfunded.
When ‘independent safeguarding operation’ arrives, those independent people will also expect to be paid.
January 20, 2025 at 11:04 PM
When ‘independent safeguarding operation’ arrives, those independent people will also expect to be paid.
Are you expecting them to do it free?
January 16, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Are you expecting them to do it free?
Why who are you thinking of burying?
January 16, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Why who are you thinking of burying?
By the Charity Commission?
January 15, 2025 at 11:34 PM
By the Charity Commission?
Good that issue has been recognised.
January 15, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Good that issue has been recognised.