In the age of AI slop, true expertise is even more important to value.

Experts are the people who get so annoyed about the precise way to describe something they dedicate their lives to it (see excellent blog: www.experimental-history.com/p/thank-you-...).

We need them and their journals.

7.2/n

A coherent text on coherence is badly needed!

I've heard of similar thing happen in the group about a decade ago.
Maybe worth asking EiC?

Nice to finally see some inversion of the typical work Denglish!

Well, they need to play early adopters game as well, otherwise other communities may point fingers and not use their results!

If on social media we're in a lull,

Means our lives are other-wise full?

(hopefully with good reasons)

*very = we're

This just rounds it up, and one can read this thread from the beginning :)

Pigments absorb part of the spectrum. Titanium dioxide does not, so can't be called a pigment. Different physics at play, different naming

Wait, do you have a reference?
Shall I expect I wont be able to see 780 nm anymore?

Looks like a perfect opportunity to explain what is going on and highlight your contributions

Cue bluetorial incoming?

🎶 Imaging all the people
Sharing all the world 🎵

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one!
😉

She's great

OK, gonna look around :) thanks!
🔦🔍👁️👁️

Ich mag meinen Beruf echt gerne, aber ist natürlich nicht alles Friede Freude Eierkuchen, mit vielen strukturellen Problemen.

zB geht die Chance in der Wissenschaft beschäftigt zu bleiben mit dem Alter rapide bergab. #IchBinHanna

www.datenportal.bmbf.de/portal/de/gr...