In my experience playing solo dev games, unpolished/poorly integrated features are generally way more an issue than having too few.

Really liked the historical overview, but the ending felt a bit flat. Looking forward to more.

I think putting any expectation of responsibility on others is just an exercise in disappointment. I'm not saying I'm unsympathetic towards artists. I just find the arguments commonly used against AI art to be rather poor. They could often be applied to a human artist as easily as an AI.

I mean that example seems trash but maybe they could have a little bonus between rounds. Like if you lose a round you get to pick a heavily nerfed version of an extra fuse. I'd say test it as an extra mode first though. Could easily be trash.

It feels a bit like saying "anyone can have a six pack." You're not wrong, but people just want the result without the journey to get there. If I want a cool little character portrait for my dnd campaign, I'm probably just going to use AI. I want art, but i don't necessarily want to be an artist.

It wasn't really clear if it's included under "short form political content" or "non aggressive debates" but I find your discussions with people of similar views about why an issue is the way it is are what make me most consider my own positions.
Possibly just political explanations in general.

Thanks for the write up! I was considering refunding or not considering the discussion, but this it sound like I'll keep having a good time whenever I keep going.

Who are you planning on hitting masters with?

Sounds a bit like the fabled mid-life crisis, no?