Ahhh interesting! Makes sense, makes sense.

I applied to sit for the July bar today and am nervous about it all, but working through issues like these makes it seem *slightly* less intimidating. Thanks again!

I re-read the non disparagement clause, the landlord is clearly on one. Are you thinking the breadth of the clause could theoretically prevent the landlord from bringing an eviction action on the idea that it would be “disparaging” to Chris?
Thanks for all your answers, this is fun thinking about

Because the language could release the landlord from potential future claims that may happen after signing? Or is it more complicated than that?

(Sorry, I feel like I should know all this but property was not my best class)

Ahhh I see, so a tenant can’t sign away their right to a habitable unit! Makes sense!

I’m interested, which parts are unenforceable and why? (I’m in law school so could use the practice in issue spotting)