Let us know what you think!
Let us know what you think!
Location: Cervical Spine
Number of Patients: 1,232
Annotations: segmentation masks of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs
for 481 patients
Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s4...
Download data: data.midrc.org/discovery/H... (you have to be logged in)
Location: Cervical Spine
Number of Patients: 1,232
Annotations: segmentation masks of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs
for 481 patients
Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s4...
Download data: data.midrc.org/discovery/H... (you have to be logged in)
- automatically segments radius and ulna bones
- uses a pose estimation network to assess rotational parameters of the bones
- automatically detects fracture locations
- combines all the information to infer the 3D fracture angles
The paper has been published at MIDL.
- automatically segments radius and ulna bones
- uses a pose estimation network to assess rotational parameters of the bones
- automatically detects fracture locations
- combines all the information to infer the 3D fracture angles
The paper has been published at MIDL.
- automatically segments radius and ulna bones
- uses a pose estimation network to assess rotational parameters of the bones
- automatically detects fracture locations
- combines all the information to infer the 3D fracture angles
The paper has been published at MIDL.
- automatically segments radius and ulna bones
- uses a pose estimation network to assess rotational parameters of the bones
- automatically detects fracture locations
- combines all the information to infer the 3D fracture angles
The paper has been published at MIDL.
Congrats to Yuwen Chen, who is the first author, and the other team members!
Congrats to Yuwen Chen, who is the first author, and the other team members!
- we validated our method with 24 source domain-target domain splits for 3 medical imaging datasets
- our method outperforms SOTA by 2.9% on average in terms of Dice similarity coefficient
- published in a CVPR workshop
- we validated our method with 24 source domain-target domain splits for 3 medical imaging datasets
- our method outperforms SOTA by 2.9% on average in terms of Dice similarity coefficient
- published in a CVPR workshop