🤯 Studying how minds change
👩🏼💻 Building science tools
🦋 ♾️ 👓
🌐 maxine.science
"After locally tuning some of the hyperparameters, I swept out a number of models fixing the FLOPs budget. (For every FLOPs target you can train a small model a long time, or a big model for a short time.) It turns out that nanochat obeys very nice scaling laws"
Amazed people still think these are “altruists”.
Amazed people still think these are “altruists”.
“Actually, there is no such thing *at all* as a decision in a naturalistic setting, because a ‘decision’ implies a prespecified exogenous task structure supplying a rigid discretization of action and outcome spaces that does not occur in real life”.
People's intuitions seem to differ on what "decision" means.
For example: do animals (say, cats) make decisions? Most people would say yes, but I think some would disagree.
Do plants make decisions?
“Actually, there is no such thing *at all* as a decision in a naturalistic setting, because a ‘decision’ implies a prespecified exogenous task structure supplying a rigid discretization of action and outcome spaces that does not occur in real life”.
quickslice.slices.network
Our latest work shows that pretraining ViTs on procedural symbolic data (eg sequences of balanced parentheses) makes subsequent standard training (eg on ImageNet) more data efficient! How is this possible?! ⬇️🧵
it hits a lot of my feels about social dynamics and use within a team.
If you’re at NeurIPS and looking to work on something awesome in AI x bio, say hi to this lady (me!). We’re making real things people need with data nobody else has. And we’re recruiting! Bonus high-five for people from the atmosphere 😁
If you’re at NeurIPS and looking to work on something awesome in AI x bio, say hi to this lady (me!). We’re making real things people need with data nobody else has. And we’re recruiting! Bonus high-five for people from the atmosphere 😁
bro these people were interviewed **while they were using Claude**—that means 35% of people using your product were not satisfied with the product they were using while interviewed.
www.anthropic.com/news/anthrop...
bro these people were interviewed **while they were using Claude**—that means 35% of people using your product were not satisfied with the product they were using while interviewed.
www.anthropic.com/news/anthrop...