Link to the tweet thread x.com/AndrewCurran... and to the policy paper openai.com/global-affai...

It’s a moot point because to reach that standard they would have to appoint a former NSA director to their board. responsiblestatecraft.org/former-nsa-c...

If, hypothetically, DeepSeek could demonstrate the same privacy and security protections as their own would OpenAI welcome the competition — and possible billions in revenue and investment flowing into further R&D?

But their argument for banning the use of Chinese hardware and models is economic warfare dressed up as privacy and security measures. Of course, the intended audience knows how to read between the lines — and it’s a strategy that many agree with.

hate to say it but I still find the algorithm over there serves me more of what holds my attention. I'm trying to crosspost in both places but that only applies to my original content; replies is where actual conversations happen.

Wait, now Bannon’s the anti-racist guy? Ok…

Happened to me once and I’ve never been the same

(Alt text: screenshot of a Twitter post “On the other app, yesterday Hugging Face released a dataset of one million posts. The anti-ai reaction was so negative that they took down the dataset. Now an anon pfp has released a dataset with two million posts.”. Post includes a screenshot of a Bsky post)

wow!

I've been reminded that ACON has gone through some changes and a number of people have had negative experiences working with them. Considered taking this post down but will leave it for now with this note, as on the face of it at least Listening and Truth Telling sounds worthwhile.