That’s a bit of an odd expectation unless there is significant proof provided. That’s generally a conspiracy theorists approach, ask a question and then expect the other person to respond, and if they don’t, that’s possible evidence for the conspiracy. Interested to see your evidence for it.

At least the 1991 attack was as a result of Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait. Now everything else that happened to lead up to that is obviously a different matter, but Hussein did invade first. so not quite like the others.

His weak anti-brexit statements, vs vehement support, say otherwise. We needed a counter to the lies and constant media presence of the pro-brexit side. He was the nominative leader of the left. He should have led that counter. He was effectively MIA for most of that time.

And appears not to have done so for over 20 years. If it’s about moving fast and breaking things, that’s been the motto for a long time.

Will never forgive him for tacitly supporting Brexit. There’s standing by what you believe and then there’s being able to actually do politics and be able to change your mind when presented with more info. He can’t do the latter

That’s what regulation is for. So it’s the fact that the US hasn’t increased regulation or prosecuted them effectively when they have broken regs.