Mean

The ones from the group of @gozziale.bsky.social are much better!

I agree on the last part. It's a tempting claim, but the link is indirect and multifactorial.

But I think that the link holds not only in simulations. There are quite a few (more or less indirect) papers showing that the arrow holds also in messy experiments!

1/f exponent = E/I ratio seems excessive, but I’d defend E/I ratio* -> 1/f exponent

*among other things

nice paper!

That’s most likely a W though

Indeed, too bad. I wonder if they reach continuous activity by that age.
I would also love it if sharing ephys data would be the norm, but by the "data availability" section, I guess that only sequencing data will be made openly accessible.

😂

Science social media is in a dire state these days. Can’t be too picky

I see that you're indeed unusually quiet on LinkedIn!

I guess I could have argumented better what I wanted to say but.. character limits 😀
I hope it's understandable

2/2
"Is it [..] different from the evidence that if you filter a signal in a specific band you get some nonzero number even if you don't have a pure oscillation?"
I think that's it, but surprising (to me) how strong the effect is! And it's very common to ignore it and misinterpret freq-specific FC.

1/2
Thank you, the comment is only visible if you sign into the platform, that's probably why I couldn't see it before!
First of all, I love the comments. I wish more people took the time to discuss papers openly like you do.

also, I feel guilty to have tried to convince you to use LinkedIn for science stuff. I saw the paper there and tried to repost it with the meme. Not possible 🤮👎

most normal Ja celebration 😂

Feynman said it best!

I can't follow the link

there must be a better way of doing this, somebody please help me out 😂

love the colored pencils. you have to make those grant applications colorful!