I would've been interested in reading this but it's behind a pay wall.

So do you want scrutiny as a journalist? Do you not want people to acknowledge that your words as a journalist or the publication you wrote for can have "catastrophic effects". You need to own your words. And not hide behind semantics. You are doing yourself a real disservice here.

You claim it "bizarre" that people respond to content that has YOUR name attributed to it. Which is bonkers. You either want scrutiny as a supposed journalist, or the freedom to regurgitate press releases scott free you cant have both.

So you're annoyed your feelings got hurt, not that the point stands as valid?

Your name isn't in that quote? So you seem to be the one now lumping yourself in with them. And getting your self wound up about a legitimate response to the words you reported.

Genuine question. Do you not want people to have a response to what you write?

Helen has a lot more knowledge and investment in Perry than most so is their input not valid?

We were hoping for Drippings last month, but missed put and had to "settle" with celebration.