You too can read this garbage.
The bloke incited violence. He is free to do it but not without consequence
archive.ph/rAheD

I am not supporting them. But designating them terrorist is nuts

Isn't motivation a mitigating factor.
In cases of vandalism eg of coal trains, juries found climate activists not guilty because their motive mitigated their action.

You have failed to construct any argument to support your pov. Just rudeness.
My position is perfectly sensible. The phrase terrorism should be reserved for terrorism.
Not peaceful direct action. Not vandalism, not non lethal violence.

Blowing up buildings was what that was drafted to mean. Not vandalism

Wrong. I very much am not alright with it.
Those actions are criminal and should be dealt with by the courts
They are not terrorism.

Your attempt to say it's terrorism or nothing is wrong

The first part is way too broad

They did not have the objective of killing people. Terrorism should be reserved for that.
If they committed other offences they can be appropriately charged

Physical attacks are not terrorism
"six people aged 20-30 years old were arrested on suspicion of a range of offences including Section 18 wounding with intent, aggravated burglary, burglary and criminal damage."

Idiotic. Being a terrorist means trying to kill people. Anything else is a dilution of the phrase

six people aged 20-30 years old were arrested on suspicion of a range of offences including Section 18 wounding with intent, aggravated burglary, burglary and criminal damage.
Not terrorists

But is that most effective for service organisation? If the pop is low, you will lose economies of scale.
No reason why a single authority cannot have multi site delivery under an efficient management structure.

That last point was so true at Headingley. Including just going out to play as soon as the ground was fit, not announcing a start time in 15 minutes.

Wow what a sad aggressive person you are.
3 opportunities to send me to an informative article, not taken. Goodbye

Interesting because the point about vpns came from an article by the guardians technology correspondent.
Ie the id checker could be honest and the vpn not.
You clearly have no idea how the various techs work. I would like to find out to make a proper asessment