Ok but which is it?!?

It seems to me that ‘silent’ is pretty good for wordless but that the ‘fragend‘ gets lost. Pleading or questioning?

@magnusz.bsky.social informs me that the name of the cultural minister in the period was in fact Eichhörn!

I’m stealing this reference for a piece on silence in the philosophical canon.

And 40 years after Peter Osborne published his now (in)famous review of Rose’s Hegel contra Sociology in RP, R. L. Scott has written a really interesting piece on what her phenomenology of necessary illusion brings to critical theory today. Enjoy your August reading!

Check out: an interview with Sophie Lewis; Anselmetti on Ghassan Kanafani; Z. el Nabolsy’s obituary for Paulin Hountondji; articles by F.T.C. Manning on real abstraction and E. Baglioni on reproductive subsumption; a commentary by F. Renz on the UK supreme court and what it means to be a woman!

Woah, that’s a lot of Schmitt. I nominate @lottelist.bsky.social to read and review.

@lottelist.bsky.social, @magnusz.bsky.social, and I just need two to three more years in our politics of German Idealism reading group then we will be ready to review your work properly within the context of ‘the zeitgeist’.

Johann Gottlieb? More like Johann Hottlieb.

Collective reading/performance already in the works for Rotterdam 👩‍🌾🔱

Now we just need @lottelist.bsky.social to report back on whether this indeed is the case.

Keep your mind in hell and despair not. Sign me up!

Agreed! My intuition is to defend/side with Adorno in regard to the framing in your introduction. But even if that’s not addressed directly in the book, I still look forward to the publication.

This looks great! Curious to see how you read the historical conditions for the gesture of actualisation (that is, despite the caution that it is mistake to ask ‘when’ philosophy is actualised, how might we think the relation between the project of actualisation and the context of actualisation?).