Of course the dems will keep doing the same shit, just with a veneer of decorum. The same way Obama wanted to look forwards, and not back, so he could let the Bush admin off the hook. Neither party wants to set the precedent of holding the other to account for stuff they both do.

When you stub your toe under communism, that's communisms fault but when you suffer and are immiserated under capitalism, that's not capitalism fault, oh no, that's your individual failing. Funny how capitalism is never held to the standards it judges other systems by.

Historically, the UK gov has form in letting hunger strikers die. Unacceptable then and unacceptable now.

The boot has no nutritional value, you can stop licking.

Its Anthony Bourdain, also dead.

Not surprised that MM values property more than people. Shameful

Correct, both are war criminals. Libs just prefer Obama because he did his murdering and imperialism with decorum and flowery speeches.

So sad, they're trying to look for the slightest thing they can use to dismiss your argument instead of engaging with it.

Parenti never misses!

Once there's proper regulation to ensure its fair for passengers and drivers, all good. Paul is right that once Uber drives taxis out of business, they'll up prices as there will be no alternative.

Libs will see the evidence, recognise it, then some sort of reset button gets tripped in their brains and they go back to regurgitating right wing talking points/propaganda without missing a beat. To admit they were wrong would shatter their worldview so they prefer to double down.