Manya Arora | Caffeinated Copywriter
@manyaarora.bsky.social
One-woman marketing storm (with a latte in hand).
Email Marketer obsessed with coffee, poetry and copy!
Stop hard selling, connect with your audience first. | X & LinkedIn Ghostwriter |
Email Marketer obsessed with coffee, poetry and copy!
Stop hard selling, connect with your audience first. | X & LinkedIn Ghostwriter |
So, you see, it’s not just about the day—it’s about knowing when your audience is most likely to engage.
Would you test weekend emails, or are you team weekday only?
Drop your thoughts! 👇
5/5
Would you test weekend emails, or are you team weekday only?
Drop your thoughts! 👇
5/5
April 12, 2025 at 4:27 PM
So, you see, it’s not just about the day—it’s about knowing when your audience is most likely to engage.
Would you test weekend emails, or are you team weekday only?
Drop your thoughts! 👇
5/5
Would you test weekend emails, or are you team weekday only?
Drop your thoughts! 👇
5/5
3. Weekend Emails?
Not a Dead Zone –
Many say weekends are bad for email.
But context matters.
If you hit inboxes when your audience is relaxed, your email might just be the one they actually open.
4/5
Not a Dead Zone –
Many say weekends are bad for email.
But context matters.
If you hit inboxes when your audience is relaxed, your email might just be the one they actually open.
4/5
April 12, 2025 at 4:27 PM
3. Weekend Emails?
Not a Dead Zone –
Many say weekends are bad for email.
But context matters.
If you hit inboxes when your audience is relaxed, your email might just be the one they actually open.
4/5
Not a Dead Zone –
Many say weekends are bad for email.
But context matters.
If you hit inboxes when your audience is relaxed, your email might just be the one they actually open.
4/5
2. The Subject Line Effect –
The second email’s subject abruptly cuts off, triggering curiosity.
The first one, while intriguing, lacks that same “Wait… what’s missing?” pull.
3/5
The second email’s subject abruptly cuts off, triggering curiosity.
The first one, while intriguing, lacks that same “Wait… what’s missing?” pull.
3/5
April 12, 2025 at 4:27 PM
2. The Subject Line Effect –
The second email’s subject abruptly cuts off, triggering curiosity.
The first one, while intriguing, lacks that same “Wait… what’s missing?” pull.
3/5
The second email’s subject abruptly cuts off, triggering curiosity.
The first one, while intriguing, lacks that same “Wait… what’s missing?” pull.
3/5
1. Timing in relation to audience behavior –
The first email landed at Friday 4 PM EST when people were still busy at work.
The second one hit closer to 5:18 PM EST, when they were winding down, casually checking emails.
2/5
The first email landed at Friday 4 PM EST when people were still busy at work.
The second one hit closer to 5:18 PM EST, when they were winding down, casually checking emails.
2/5
April 12, 2025 at 4:27 PM
1. Timing in relation to audience behavior –
The first email landed at Friday 4 PM EST when people were still busy at work.
The second one hit closer to 5:18 PM EST, when they were winding down, casually checking emails.
2/5
The first email landed at Friday 4 PM EST when people were still busy at work.
The second one hit closer to 5:18 PM EST, when they were winding down, casually checking emails.
2/5