Your King will simply convince them that a real war is then necessary...

Considering the state of your judiciary, it will be russian roulette for protesters.
If they are judged by a Republican judge, it will always be "illegal".
If they are judged by a Democratic judge, it will always be legal.
See the problem?

Ahimè omonimo, è la differenza tra una dittatura soft come quella indiana, che ogni tanto per sbaglio ne combina una giusta, e una democrazia dei fessi come la nostra dove ogni analfabeta si sente in dovere di avere un'opinione a caso...

I agree with Mark. Billionaires should help the communities where they made their fortunes in the first place.

Ovviamente costava poco inizialmente quando doveva rubare quote di mercato, ora aumenta regolarmente. Succederà come con altri servizi, prima o poi mi scogliono e li disattivo (e lo faccio davvero quando superano la soglia della mia tolleranza).

I really hope your post is ironic

La mia fida collezione di CD acquistati, più saltuariamente YouTube music (visto che comunque pago la premium per i video)

To improve it?

They had all the information necessary in the world. They chose deliberately to ignore it. They wanted hatred and revenge on something that exists only in their head. Even worse, implanted.
You keep "showing the other cheek", they will keep slapping it.

I don't expect the Chinese government to use my biometric data to send a killer drone here in the EU.
And if they wished so, they could simply buy all the necessary from US oligarchs.

Here's a visionary, creative, suggestion: drastic limitations to real estate "investors". The market must remain local, otherwise it is mostly used as a semi-legal way to launder money from non-EU countries.

We need to understand that many, many people want to use social media as entertainment, not as an information source.
I would be perfectly happy in a place that completely bans politics, because for that I have other more reliable sources.

Just because it has "red" in its name 😂

✅ Clarity on illegal content

What is illegal offline has no place online. No platform is asked to remove any lawful content, but platforms must have appropriate risk mitigation measures for content that is potentially harmful, for example for children.

Eh? Two benefits for the UK and zero for the rest of Europe? Sure.

In the two technologies you mentioned, interoperability was an obvious shared interest. I was only contesting your categorical faith in the so called "market" that regularly fails and morphs into monopolies and sub optimal decisions that are bad for the customers and for the world.

"the market regulates itself...". NO, it never happened and it will never happen 😂
I can finally carry only one charger and cable with me, in a much lighter backpack.

Please ban Twitter before it further amplifies hate and division in Europe.