Steve Manta
@mantalicious.bsky.social
Over-caffeinated Radical Downtown Urbanite. Member of the laptop class. Beekeeping age. Cyborg Slave of Satan (allegedly)
How big does he think vaccines are?
September 23, 2025 at 12:34 AM
How big does he think vaccines are?
Wow, I’m sure everyone is going to be real upset at the next chapter meeting
September 18, 2025 at 12:46 AM
Wow, I’m sure everyone is going to be real upset at the next chapter meeting
One is a mistake. Multiple are not
September 11, 2025 at 9:14 PM
One is a mistake. Multiple are not
September 8, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Just so I’m clear, he’s arguing child sexual abuse by clergy is a freedom of religion issue?
July 25, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Just so I’m clear, he’s arguing child sexual abuse by clergy is a freedom of religion issue?
Can you imagine the reaction if Rachel Notley had her husband sit in on union discussions
July 15, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Can you imagine the reaction if Rachel Notley had her husband sit in on union discussions
It will be interesting since in their election platform they committed to “capping, not cutting, public service employment”
July 10, 2025 at 4:55 PM
It will be interesting since in their election platform they committed to “capping, not cutting, public service employment”
The tax exemption was given because they argued the public benefit they provided in community services (e.g. housing and feeding the poor) exceeded the value they’d pay in taxes. If they aren’t providing that value and now want to become political, they can be taxed
July 9, 2025 at 1:50 AM
The tax exemption was given because they argued the public benefit they provided in community services (e.g. housing and feeding the poor) exceeded the value they’d pay in taxes. If they aren’t providing that value and now want to become political, they can be taxed
Recreated from what? Birds?
June 20, 2025 at 11:45 AM
Recreated from what? Birds?
They literally campaigned on it. Its all in their platform
June 15, 2025 at 4:00 PM
They literally campaigned on it. Its all in their platform
They campaigned on it. Its all in their platform
June 15, 2025 at 3:59 PM
They campaigned on it. Its all in their platform
There was no lie. They campaigned on it. It was in their platform
June 15, 2025 at 3:58 PM
There was no lie. They campaigned on it. It was in their platform
It was all in their platform. People that are upset obviously didnt read it
June 15, 2025 at 3:57 PM
It was all in their platform. People that are upset obviously didnt read it
They campaigned on this stuff. It was in their platform
June 15, 2025 at 3:56 PM
They campaigned on this stuff. It was in their platform
Sure, but there are no consequences
June 13, 2025 at 1:11 AM
Sure, but there are no consequences
Fair. The “reasonable grounds” part and scope has to be more clearly defined in committee before its passed. But this really isnt as scary as its been made out to be. Most of it is clarifying and powers that already were there
June 12, 2025 at 1:15 AM
Fair. The “reasonable grounds” part and scope has to be more clearly defined in committee before its passed. But this really isnt as scary as its been made out to be. Most of it is clarifying and powers that already were there
No, the Customs Act applies to international borders. CBSA has no authority to open/inspect domestic mail. However, Bill C2 would amend the Canada Post Corporation Act, allowing Canada Post to open and inspect letter mail in certain circumstances under “reasonable grounds” with law enforcement
June 12, 2025 at 12:03 AM
No, the Customs Act applies to international borders. CBSA has no authority to open/inspect domestic mail. However, Bill C2 would amend the Canada Post Corporation Act, allowing Canada Post to open and inspect letter mail in certain circumstances under “reasonable grounds” with law enforcement
Perhaps police work isnt the right career for Mr Doduk
June 11, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Perhaps police work isnt the right career for Mr Doduk
This right to search was there before. It was in the Customs Act and there was no warrant required. It was challenged in court. This is just clarifying and that right that was previously there
June 11, 2025 at 12:43 PM
This right to search was there before. It was in the Customs Act and there was no warrant required. It was challenged in court. This is just clarifying and that right that was previously there