Eric S (he/hi[m/s])
malverbird.bsky.social
Eric S (he/hi[m/s])
@malverbird.bsky.social
Music hobbyist in the US. (Age: mid-50s.)
If you want me to unfollow you etc., comment or message.
(Even in regards the primary; Sanders has not distinguished himself with his support for Mr Swastika-Tattoo gubernatorial candidate recently…)
December 3, 2025 at 3:07 AM
Apologies for my tone, but I’m not proud of our system, I’d have been ashamed of voting differently or not voting.
December 3, 2025 at 3:06 AM
Yes and no respectively. I sure as didn’t vote for the orange taco either time…
December 3, 2025 at 2:57 AM
You even link a video that doesn’t contain your own “quote” …
September 25, 2025 at 12:58 AM
and as I guessed, you went to that take without thinking or caring about “is this one of the important rules”?
September 13, 2025 at 5:12 PM
(more interesting to me than anything he may have written on the casings are his apparent connections with Fuentes…)
September 13, 2025 at 3:30 PM
exactly…
(ok, 23 minute speech. But still.)
September 13, 2025 at 3:25 PM
“For 33 hours, I was praying that if this had to happen here that it wouldn't be one of us — that -somebody drove from another state-” (my emphasis; I can’t stand the guy but really.) is the quote I’m actually able to find. It’s only a 5.5 minute speech, available online.
September 13, 2025 at 3:22 PM
were those his words? “not one of us” has been interpreted a few different ways and quote marks are reserved for actual quotes for a reason
September 13, 2025 at 1:18 PM
They’ve explicitly meant to replace the competent (sorry, the “Deep State”) with their cronies for ages…
September 12, 2025 at 12:27 PM
Bártok?
August 17, 2025 at 10:48 PM
They’re in 2028, not 2029. I agree he’s way more than heading that way, but his term would end January 20 2029, iirc, unless he dies first (etc) or does manage to effectively change our system of government.
August 5, 2025 at 9:11 PM
That’s not what I asked.
July 15, 2025 at 1:27 PM
but nah, respond that way instead.
July 15, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Interesting response to someone who just asked you to clarify the meaning of one word, prolific, which means much-producing (like a prolific parent- many children- or a prolific legislator- creates much legislation- or a prolific author- has written a lot. But a “prolific speech”? ya lost me.)
July 15, 2025 at 1:24 PM
about 12 minutes in - since Rosie O’Donnell’s father wasn’t born in Ireland, the question under the new regulations (or just the EO) might be whether he was naturalized yet when she was born. SCOTUS hasn’t ruled on these would-be changes yet and whether they’re retroactive to DJT and his parents…
July 15, 2025 at 1:20 PM
and I don’t know what you do mean.
July 14, 2025 at 4:29 AM
not being picky but not sure what you mean by a prolific speech. That adjective doesn’t fit.
July 14, 2025 at 4:28 AM
Awww!
The only bad doggie is a US government department
July 14, 2025 at 4:24 AM
Because it’s a week for works with -really- effective fugatos ;)
July 14, 2025 at 3:00 AM
Now listening to a new recording of Erkki Melartin’s 5th symphony (1908-16) (score here erkkimelartin.fi/em/wp-conten... )
erkkimelartin.fi
July 14, 2025 at 2:59 AM
Except apparently unintentionally, yeah
July 14, 2025 at 2:58 AM
Because Rosie O’Donnell is rightly no Trump fan…
July 14, 2025 at 2:49 AM