Małgorzata Kot
@malgorzatakot.bsky.social
Archaeologist interested in Neanderthals and their lithic technologies.
Usually somewhere between Central Asia and Central Europe.
Professor at the #University of Warsaw
Usually somewhere between Central Asia and Central Europe.
Professor at the #University of Warsaw
Zandra, you are as great donkey keeper as a team companion. It was a great joy to have you with us. It's a pity you couldn't stay longer.
June 18, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Zandra, you are as great donkey keeper as a team companion. It was a great joy to have you with us. It's a pity you couldn't stay longer.
There is no treshold here. It all depends on your scope. If you wanna really read scar by scar- drop it. No point. Especially when combine these results and our previous JAS paper "Can we read stones?". But if you do it to determine generał knapping scheme it should work with average error rate.
February 2, 2025 at 11:03 PM
There is no treshold here. It all depends on your scope. If you wanna really read scar by scar- drop it. No point. Especially when combine these results and our previous JAS paper "Can we read stones?". But if you do it to determine generał knapping scheme it should work with average error rate.
We also created a dedicated web app where you can test your error rate in diacritic analysis. Check out the FlintReader:
flintreader.archeologia.uw.edu.pl
flintreader.archeologia.uw.edu.pl
February 1, 2025 at 12:40 AM
We also created a dedicated web app where you can test your error rate in diacritic analysis. Check out the FlintReader:
flintreader.archeologia.uw.edu.pl
flintreader.archeologia.uw.edu.pl
Ca 5% of all analysed scars are too difficult to identify their relative chronology.
February 1, 2025 at 12:40 AM
Ca 5% of all analysed scars are too difficult to identify their relative chronology.
The error rate differs due to the directionality of scars, raw material and the length of the ridge.
February 1, 2025 at 12:40 AM
The error rate differs due to the directionality of scars, raw material and the length of the ridge.
The errors are made not randomly but mostly in specific-difficult places.
February 1, 2025 at 12:40 AM
The errors are made not randomly but mostly in specific-difficult places.
But the average error rate is higher among beginners (25%) than experts (15%).
February 1, 2025 at 12:40 AM
But the average error rate is higher among beginners (25%) than experts (15%).
we found out that the average error rate in the diacritic analysis of lithics is 21%.
February 1, 2025 at 12:40 AM
we found out that the average error rate in the diacritic analysis of lithics is 21%.