StoneCrow3
@malachais.bsky.social
Linguist; witch; woodcarver; age 69; mildly autistic; straight.
Very liberal, vehemently opposing fascism, MAGA, Christian Nationalism, Project 2025, anything else antidemocracy.
HAPPILY MARRIED: Please respect that! If you won't, I'll block you.
Very liberal, vehemently opposing fascism, MAGA, Christian Nationalism, Project 2025, anything else antidemocracy.
HAPPILY MARRIED: Please respect that! If you won't, I'll block you.
Yes! Civil disobedience! Ignore Trump's so-called "executive orders." Ignore HIM! Treat him like the narcissistic toddler that he is by taking away his audience!
February 7, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Yes! Civil disobedience! Ignore Trump's so-called "executive orders." Ignore HIM! Treat him like the narcissistic toddler that he is by taking away his audience!
Yes! Civil disobedience! Ignore his so-called "execute orders." Keep organizations running that he is trying to shut down! Ignore HIM, AND anyone who supports him! That's the absolute worst insult to a narcissist--take away his audience (btw, also the best way to deal with a toddler's tantrum.)
February 7, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Yes! Civil disobedience! Ignore his so-called "execute orders." Keep organizations running that he is trying to shut down! Ignore HIM, AND anyone who supports him! That's the absolute worst insult to a narcissist--take away his audience (btw, also the best way to deal with a toddler's tantrum.)
I think the only ones who are going to do that is us.
February 5, 2025 at 3:41 AM
I think the only ones who are going to do that is us.
Would that it were that simple. Unfortunately, no state is solidly one or the other. They all have both sides present.
February 5, 2025 at 3:40 AM
Would that it were that simple. Unfortunately, no state is solidly one or the other. They all have both sides present.
newer stuff, and sell to other, richer people at higher prices? That's unconscionable, even as a business practice, much less as diplomacy. What, is he channeling his old, real estate robber-baron persona? Or, is he too senile to realize that was decades ago and has nothing to do with a presidency?
February 5, 2025 at 3:33 AM
newer stuff, and sell to other, richer people at higher prices? That's unconscionable, even as a business practice, much less as diplomacy. What, is he channeling his old, real estate robber-baron persona? Or, is he too senile to realize that was decades ago and has nothing to do with a presidency?
THIS THREATENS A STUPID ACT OF WAR!
1. The President has no authority to commit troops anywhere without Congressional approval. He certainly can't declare war on a whim. Only Congress can declare war. 2. His diplomatic solution to Gaza is evict the tenants, bulldoze existing infrastructure, build
1. The President has no authority to commit troops anywhere without Congressional approval. He certainly can't declare war on a whim. Only Congress can declare war. 2. His diplomatic solution to Gaza is evict the tenants, bulldoze existing infrastructure, build
February 5, 2025 at 3:33 AM
THIS THREATENS A STUPID ACT OF WAR!
1. The President has no authority to commit troops anywhere without Congressional approval. He certainly can't declare war on a whim. Only Congress can declare war. 2. His diplomatic solution to Gaza is evict the tenants, bulldoze existing infrastructure, build
1. The President has no authority to commit troops anywhere without Congressional approval. He certainly can't declare war on a whim. Only Congress can declare war. 2. His diplomatic solution to Gaza is evict the tenants, bulldoze existing infrastructure, build
20. Congressional Research Service, "Recall of Legislators and the Removal of Members of Congress from Office," January 5, 2012
February 5, 2025 at 3:08 AM
20. Congressional Research Service, "Recall of Legislators and the Removal of Members of Congress from Office," January 5, 2012
noted legal precedent is U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, in which the Supreme Court decided that states did not have the right to impose new terms, qualifications, or conditions of service on federal officials.[20]
February 5, 2025 at 3:08 AM
noted legal precedent is U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, in which the Supreme Court decided that states did not have the right to impose new terms, qualifications, or conditions of service on federal officials.[20]
not included in the final version. Some state constitutions have stated the right of citizens to recall their members of the United States Congress, but whether it is constitutionally legal at the federal level has not been yet been ruled upon by the United States Supreme Court. One of the closest
February 5, 2025 at 3:08 AM
not included in the final version. Some state constitutions have stated the right of citizens to recall their members of the United States Congress, but whether it is constitutionally legal at the federal level has not been yet been ruled upon by the United States Supreme Court. One of the closest
I hate to burst your bubble, but I found the following online.
"Recall of federal officials
ballotpedia.org/Laws_governi...
The United States Constitution does not provide for recall of any elected federal official. The option was considered during the drafting of of the document in 1787, but was
"Recall of federal officials
ballotpedia.org/Laws_governi...
The United States Constitution does not provide for recall of any elected federal official. The option was considered during the drafting of of the document in 1787, but was
Laws governing recall
Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics
ballotpedia.org
February 5, 2025 at 3:08 AM
I hate to burst your bubble, but I found the following online.
"Recall of federal officials
ballotpedia.org/Laws_governi...
The United States Constitution does not provide for recall of any elected federal official. The option was considered during the drafting of of the document in 1787, but was
"Recall of federal officials
ballotpedia.org/Laws_governi...
The United States Constitution does not provide for recall of any elected federal official. The option was considered during the drafting of of the document in 1787, but was
I would support impeachment of the entire Trump administration, complete cancellation of everything it has tried to do, strict laws put in place to limit executive power and use of executive orders, and laws facilitating federal prosecution of money influence and gerrymandering.
February 5, 2025 at 2:11 AM
I would support impeachment of the entire Trump administration, complete cancellation of everything it has tried to do, strict laws put in place to limit executive power and use of executive orders, and laws facilitating federal prosecution of money influence and gerrymandering.
Well said. Xenophobia, especially justified mostly by stale paranoia, is useless time wasting when we have bigger problems closer to home. I may not trust the Chinese Communist Party blindly, but Chinese people on Rednote seem as curious about us as we are about them. I find that refreshing.
February 4, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Well said. Xenophobia, especially justified mostly by stale paranoia, is useless time wasting when we have bigger problems closer to home. I may not trust the Chinese Communist Party blindly, but Chinese people on Rednote seem as curious about us as we are about them. I find that refreshing.
Keep up the pressure on your end. We'll keep up the resistance here. Together, we will put these democracy-hating fascists where they all belong.
February 2, 2025 at 7:01 AM
Keep up the pressure on your end. We'll keep up the resistance here. Together, we will put these democracy-hating fascists where they all belong.
vote. Basically, if it stands, it would completely disenfranchise anyone who disagrees with the Retrumplican party line. Vigorous legal challenges are in the works, and many of us are incensed beyond words. For me, Canada, I stand with you, Mexico, China, and anyone else Trump thinks he can bully.
February 2, 2025 at 7:01 AM
vote. Basically, if it stands, it would completely disenfranchise anyone who disagrees with the Retrumplican party line. Vigorous legal challenges are in the works, and many of us are incensed beyond words. For me, Canada, I stand with you, Mexico, China, and anyone else Trump thinks he can bully.
I'm in Tennessee, whose Republican-supermajority state legislature has just passed a law making it a Class E felony for, among other things, public officials to vote against the Trump administration's immigration policies. That would carry a 1-6 year prison term, after which one could no longer
February 2, 2025 at 7:01 AM
I'm in Tennessee, whose Republican-supermajority state legislature has just passed a law making it a Class E felony for, among other things, public officials to vote against the Trump administration's immigration policies. That would carry a 1-6 year prison term, after which one could no longer
I don't think those are rocks. Instead, I see them as pieces rising from the hand to materializing into a bird of prey, perhaps an eagle. It's being summoned magically by someone we can only partially see.
February 2, 2025 at 5:57 AM
I don't think those are rocks. Instead, I see them as pieces rising from the hand to materializing into a bird of prey, perhaps an eagle. It's being summoned magically by someone we can only partially see.
Don't forget China. Trump has slapped tariffs on them, too, even if it isn't as much. He just did it to try to appeal to his war-hawk supporters.
February 2, 2025 at 5:29 AM
Don't forget China. Trump has slapped tariffs on them, too, even if it isn't as much. He just did it to try to appeal to his war-hawk supporters.
Me, either. I applaud them.
February 2, 2025 at 5:13 AM
Me, either. I applaud them.
first administration reported. One description I read likened his first administration to a 12-year-old trying to run an air traffic control tower by randomly pushing buttons. This one seems far worse. He isn't even reading the stuff he's signing, instead istening to an aide explain it all to him.
February 1, 2025 at 2:52 AM
first administration reported. One description I read likened his first administration to a 12-year-old trying to run an air traffic control tower by randomly pushing buttons. This one seems far worse. He isn't even reading the stuff he's signing, instead istening to an aide explain it all to him.
Also, keep the explanation to a single, simple point, and be prepared to repeat that same point over and over until you're sure he's gotten it. For visual aids, too, use pictures only. He hates having to read words in print except for his own name. That was what people trying to deal with his
February 1, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Also, keep the explanation to a single, simple point, and be prepared to repeat that same point over and over until you're sure he's gotten it. For visual aids, too, use pictures only. He hates having to read words in print except for his own name. That was what people trying to deal with his