Those who bet on the end of the world are not overly pessimistic or lacking in vision for the future, but overly optimistic, seeing humans as, at best, a fungible source of value, which is precisely how capital sees humans.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i...

"War? We know China is not an enemy, but imagine if we provoked them and caused some kind of backlash. Allies would be forced to resubordinate to the US and buy our technology and weapons. War would provide a great opportunity for aggressive investment."

Human life loss will be reduced to macroeconomic bottlenecks - constraints on human capital and resource allocation. Geopolitical rifts will be seen as engines of technological innovation, inflation fear is real but should be offset by the economic redundancies that a multipolar world brings.