So, any other s3 backed FS would just translate IO calls to S3 API calls.
But, ZeroFS uses slateDB, so you get the benefit of batched writes and caches for reads; leading to lesser no. of API calls, and lower cost.
Is that correct?
So, any other s3 backed FS would just translate IO calls to S3 API calls.
But, ZeroFS uses slateDB, so you get the benefit of batched writes and caches for reads; leading to lesser no. of API calls, and lower cost.
Is that correct?