I believe they had a similar dictum on non-regulation of AI for 10 years in the BBB but it was removed due to backlash.

In responding to poor logic, what is your intent? To change someone's mind? To solicit solutions from others? There are numerous articles about how to identify and rebut fallacious reasoning. Here is a good one: publicleadershipinstitute.org/messaging-gu...

Ok. They actually teach that in public speaking, debate, logic and critical thinking classes: it's called rhetorical or logical fallacies (aka bullshit arguments to try to persuade you and how to use facts and evidence to rebut those arguments).

Do we, though? What are the benefits to treating bullshit as valuable as facts?

Maybe if it was clearly labeled "fiction," like we do with novels.

You don't know me, but I am grateful for you. Your strength inspires us, your fire lights us up, and beneath it all, your kindness and empathy remind us of who we are fighting for.

I had the same reaction. Lol.

Oh, you are literally quoting the entire article. Sheesh.

Who are you quoting?

Yes! PoC also need to perform the assignment in TX. Their gerrymandering stretched thin on GOP support in some Latino and Black districts.

As we say in California, don't poke the bear.

I am a Democrat and serve as a Compliance Officer for VA mortgage lender. FYI, it's a bad business strategy insulting your partners and clients. We'll be canceling our license.

He was out golfing, not negotiating.