Magnus Løvold
magnuslovold.bsky.social
Magnus Løvold
@magnuslovold.bsky.social
Multilateral processes, treaty-making and diplomacy with NAIL and Lex International. Writing for Spoiler Alert and Points of Order.
If consensus falters, countries will have to decide whether to call for a vote or leave with failure.

By Friday, we’ll know if the world acted — or let the plastics crisis run on medium.com/points-of-or...
Ambassador Vayas takes the pen in high-stakes plastics treaty endgame
GENEVA, 13 August 2025 — Nobody but those directly involved knew exactly what was going on as the plastics treaty negotiations entered…
medium.com
August 13, 2025 at 12:14 PM
The progressive majority may seize the moment. Spoilers like 🇸🇦 and 🇷🇺 are expected to push back. Heavyweights 🇺🇸, 🇨🇳, 🇮🇳, 🇧🇷 could try to retake control.

The High Ambition Coalition’s #HAC move will be watched closely 👀
August 13, 2025 at 12:14 PM
The draft arrives with less than 48 hours left of the process. Financing measures may close to agreement, but the treaty’s core — what countries must do — is still up in the air. Delegates are bracing for a fight over ambition.
August 13, 2025 at 12:14 PM
I explore how majority-driven diplomacy could rescue the plastics treaty—and multilateralism itself—in my new piece for Backchannel, a great new Substack for commentary, intelligence, and analysis on climate diplomacy, geopolitics & the energy transition.

substack.com/home/post/p-...
The Consensus Syndrome
An effective treaty on plastic pollution will require countries to break the long-standing spell of consensus — and finally put decisions to a vote.
substack.com
July 31, 2025 at 11:27 AM
This could change in Geneva.

A clear majority of countries back a treaty to phase out the most harmful plastics and chemicals.

If they stand firm and use the tools they already have, they can deliver a strong, binding agreement.
July 31, 2025 at 11:27 AM
Majority voting is standard in global health, human rights, even nuclear disarmament.

But in environmental forums, it’s a taboo.

Consensus rules allow a handful of petrochemical and fossil fuel states to hold the planet hostage.
July 31, 2025 at 11:27 AM
For decades, environmental diplomacy has followed what Arild Underdal called the law of the least ambitious programme:

Agreements shaped not by the “ayes” of the majority but by the “nays” of the least committed.
July 31, 2025 at 11:27 AM
The story — written by journalist @emmaanne.bsky.social — raises tough questions about the perverse incentives at play in mine action.

Emma reached out @thehalotrust.bsky.social for comment. They declined.

Read the full story: spoileralerts.substack.com/p/questionab...
Questionable incentives
Why is the CEO of the world’s largest demining organisation defending banned landmines?
spoileralerts.substack.com
July 23, 2025 at 12:24 PM
“It’s highly disturbing,” says the director of @minefreeworld.bsky.social

Others in the sector describe Cowan’s logic — “don’t worry, we’ll clean it up later” — as deeply cynical.

Some fear he’s legitimising landmine use in a moment of real danger.
July 23, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Cowan’s comments come as Finland, Poland & others signal plans to withdraw from the Mine Ban Treaty.

He’s argued for so-called “non-persistent” mines — but these still harm civilians, often fail, and are banned for a reason.

Other NGOs are pushing back hard.
July 23, 2025 at 12:24 PM