Magnum
banner
magnumsocius.bsky.social
Magnum
@magnumsocius.bsky.social
Market socialist or SocDem, whichever you prefer. (29)He/him. Hater of suburbs, lover of board games
Current book: The Shadow Docket by Steve Vladeck
Do you think that Contra is just insincere here then?
July 12, 2025 at 4:13 AM
Yeah, I think we're talking about good faith and substantive criticism here.
July 12, 2025 at 1:59 AM
Why? If you think the manners and motives are harming the cause to stop the genocide then I would think trying to correct those in order to help the cause would be top of mind
July 11, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Republicans are staking everything on the decency of Democrats, writing a bill with absolutely no input or negotiations and hoping Democrats will just go along with it because they actually care about consequences.
March 12, 2025 at 3:34 AM
Testing effects of hormone therapy on asthma =\= researching turning mice transgender
March 6, 2025 at 11:09 PM
I think a lot of these guys need to talk to their girlfriends
February 20, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Nobody ever actually cared about the price of eggs, this is a stupid line
February 14, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Look at my phone* noooo
February 14, 2025 at 9:14 PM
I've never related to a post more in my life.

I keep working at my firm and every time I look at my firm I go "oh right, law doesn't matter really"
February 14, 2025 at 9:13 PM
Gee I wonder if RFK has ever said if there's a relation between those two things!
February 14, 2025 at 2:37 PM
I expect Republicans to be disingenuous in their portrayal of things, but it was VERY off-putting to watch Jeffries call it a mandate as well.

I sometimes expect our leaders in Congress to have at least a little bit better conception of reality, but they can be just as influenced by social media
February 14, 2025 at 12:46 AM
I'm losing my mind. How does Trump pardoning Adams make the prosecutors job easier? They don't have to obtain leave of the court (which they would easily get if it's an agreed dismissal?) that's zero effort.

It's also still troubling that nobody is allowed to suggest (read: question) the president
February 14, 2025 at 12:11 AM
I fail to see how this rebuts the damning footnote about advocation for quid pro quo at all.

It doesnt address the quid pro quo at all, and the reason he didn't want notes is because... they may leak? Am I supposed to think this is a standard assumption and not just a pretext for hiding the crime?
February 14, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Make it the average life expectancy of people in their specific state
February 12, 2025 at 6:05 PM
This was my problem. I had an instinct to defend the article because I think digging a little deeper into econ stats can be good, but it provided no context for that number vs other periods, so it was effectively meaningless
February 12, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Real
February 8, 2025 at 4:55 AM