Machiko Kanetake
@machikokanetake.bsky.social
International Law Prof. Asser Institute & Univ. of Amsterdam; Board Member, European Society of International Law; security, human rights, tech
Reposted by Machiko Kanetake
3. The report embraces the 'direct and foreseeable impact' standard for establishing extraterritorial jurisdiction—well ahead of the approach taken by, for example, the ECtHR. This standard could open new avenues for litigating extraterritorial human rights violations against migrants.
October 16, 2025 at 8:16 AM
3. The report embraces the 'direct and foreseeable impact' standard for establishing extraterritorial jurisdiction—well ahead of the approach taken by, for example, the ECtHR. This standard could open new avenues for litigating extraterritorial human rights violations against migrants.
Nice introduction!
August 28, 2025 at 11:13 PM
Nice introduction!
Reposted by Machiko Kanetake
In its justification for the rejection, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs fails to mention of the use of the profiling algorithm and doesn’t provide an assessment of its impact on human rights. The court hereby mandates a Fundamental Rights Impacts Assessment. 3/
August 18, 2025 at 8:50 AM
In its justification for the rejection, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs fails to mention of the use of the profiling algorithm and doesn’t provide an assessment of its impact on human rights. The court hereby mandates a Fundamental Rights Impacts Assessment. 3/