@macfromx.bsky.social
This cat seems to be dead no matter how many times the court collapses the wave function.
November 23, 2025 at 4:40 AM
This cat seems to be dead no matter how many times the court collapses the wave function.
Here are some JFK sppech excerpts. You've probably heard most, if not all, of them. But, they're worth hearing again. They starkly, and sadly, reveal just how far we've since fallen as a nation.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfpv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Hv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVXq...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfpv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Hv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVXq...
November 23, 2025 at 2:53 AM
Here are some JFK sppech excerpts. You've probably heard most, if not all, of them. But, they're worth hearing again. They starkly, and sadly, reveal just how far we've since fallen as a nation.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfpv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Hv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVXq...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfpv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Hv...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVXq...
Seriously, Trump's been a Daily Stormer darling ever since he announced candidacy from the bowels of Trump Tower. He's been a Daily Stormer icon ever since Charlottesville.
Last year, it hurt my heart to see well-intentioned Hasidic neighbors turn out-"Souls to the Polls" style- to vote Trump.
Last year, it hurt my heart to see well-intentioned Hasidic neighbors turn out-"Souls to the Polls" style- to vote Trump.
November 21, 2025 at 1:33 AM
Seriously, Trump's been a Daily Stormer darling ever since he announced candidacy from the bowels of Trump Tower. He's been a Daily Stormer icon ever since Charlottesville.
Last year, it hurt my heart to see well-intentioned Hasidic neighbors turn out-"Souls to the Polls" style- to vote Trump.
Last year, it hurt my heart to see well-intentioned Hasidic neighbors turn out-"Souls to the Polls" style- to vote Trump.
I rate Trump a minus 11.
November 20, 2025 at 4:14 AM
I rate Trump a minus 11.
Here are the two f$*ked up indictment instruments, appended to the post I did that day. Halligan is 36. Still young, but not young enough to have any excuses.
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
November 20, 2025 at 3:54 AM
Here are the two f$*ked up indictment instruments, appended to the post I did that day. Halligan is 36. Still young, but not young enough to have any excuses.
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
Cluster f$*k known since initial hearing. Halligan predictably catastrophic & potentially in longer-term Bar trouble. And this is independent of fact that her appointment may be invalid, which could void already defective indictment & bounce already meritless case under SOL.
bsky.app/profile/macf...
bsky.app/profile/macf...
Cluster F.
1 Which is it?
a 2-count?
b 3-count?
c Non-concur on 1 count or all?
2 Does 2-count omit "Person 2" because GJ declined to indict on count referencing "Person 2"?
3 Foreperson interlineated in non-concur memo?
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
1 Which is it?
a 2-count?
b 3-count?
c Non-concur on 1 count or all?
2 Does 2-count omit "Person 2" because GJ declined to indict on count referencing "Person 2"?
3 Foreperson interlineated in non-concur memo?
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:...
Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
November 20, 2025 at 3:47 AM
Cluster f$*k known since initial hearing. Halligan predictably catastrophic & potentially in longer-term Bar trouble. And this is independent of fact that her appointment may be invalid, which could void already defective indictment & bounce already meritless case under SOL.
bsky.app/profile/macf...
bsky.app/profile/macf...
Remarks befitting a republic's Malignant Narcissist in Chief.
November 19, 2025 at 7:23 AM
Remarks befitting a republic's Malignant Narcissist in Chief.
Only when the American electorate grasps fundamental American civics, acquires genuine discernment and persistently votes in actual support of its own interests.
November 19, 2025 at 7:19 AM
Only when the American electorate grasps fundamental American civics, acquires genuine discernment and persistently votes in actual support of its own interests.
She's only 28. On some level, putting her in this position is akin to child abuse. I suspect she's too coddled, inexperienced & immature to grasp the seriousness of her mendacity & the potential long-term consequences of her iies.
November 13, 2025 at 5:41 AM
She's only 28. On some level, putting her in this position is akin to child abuse. I suspect she's too coddled, inexperienced & immature to grasp the seriousness of her mendacity & the potential long-term consequences of her iies.
Fed up w/ whiners who don't get it's for the People, not a political party, to preserve our republic.
Because of them:
No universal healthcare
Unions busted
Roe gone
Fascism/Oligarchy reign
Stop rewarding GOP fuckery by bitching at Dems. Either *persistently & *meaningfully empower Dems or STFU!
Because of them:
No universal healthcare
Unions busted
Roe gone
Fascism/Oligarchy reign
Stop rewarding GOP fuckery by bitching at Dems. Either *persistently & *meaningfully empower Dems or STFU!
November 10, 2025 at 5:03 AM
Fed up w/ whiners who don't get it's for the People, not a political party, to preserve our republic.
Because of them:
No universal healthcare
Unions busted
Roe gone
Fascism/Oligarchy reign
Stop rewarding GOP fuckery by bitching at Dems. Either *persistently & *meaningfully empower Dems or STFU!
Because of them:
No universal healthcare
Unions busted
Roe gone
Fascism/Oligarchy reign
Stop rewarding GOP fuckery by bitching at Dems. Either *persistently & *meaningfully empower Dems or STFU!
Go ahead. Keep helping Trump and the GOP establish a fascist oligarchy.
November 10, 2025 at 4:29 AM
Go ahead. Keep helping Trump and the GOP establish a fascist oligarchy.
"Dampened turnout" is on Dem voters. It's ultimately the responsibility of the People, not the Dems or any other political party, to preserve a free & just republic. Roe v. Wade was overturned because of "dampened turnout". That's on Dem voters, not HRC.
November 10, 2025 at 2:39 AM
"Dampened turnout" is on Dem voters. It's ultimately the responsibility of the People, not the Dems or any other political party, to preserve a free & just republic. Roe v. Wade was overturned because of "dampened turnout". That's on Dem voters, not HRC.
As much as Dems were ever going to get.
November 10, 2025 at 2:31 AM
As much as Dems were ever going to get.
Primaries fine. But Dem voters still must vote for whomever Dem nominee ends up being. If not, republic will continue to erode into austerity & fascism. Fed up with asymmetry of fighting against GOP, whose very goal is mayhem & destruction of gov't. It's not on Dems. It's on feckless Dem voters.
November 10, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Primaries fine. But Dem voters still must vote for whomever Dem nominee ends up being. If not, republic will continue to erode into austerity & fascism. Fed up with asymmetry of fighting against GOP, whose very goal is mayhem & destruction of gov't. It's not on Dems. It's on feckless Dem voters.
Not "caving" tonight won't solve that problem.
November 10, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Not "caving" tonight won't solve that problem.
"Won't fight"? GMAFB. We have the longest shutdown in history, FFS. So enough moderates helped break filibuster. People are hurting.
November 10, 2025 at 2:07 AM
"Won't fight"? GMAFB. We have the longest shutdown in history, FFS. So enough moderates helped break filibuster. People are hurting.
How about Dems voting for Dems in earnest and doubling down when the GOP obstructs? Dems got us OCare in the first place.
November 10, 2025 at 2:03 AM
How about Dems voting for Dems in earnest and doubling down when the GOP obstructs? Dems got us OCare in the first place.
No. It's bad for working people too.
November 10, 2025 at 1:56 AM
No. It's bad for working people too.
And USCA6 didn't hold using those pronouns "doesn't count as harassment/insult." Not core issue. Core issue is whether school district policy proscribing students' use of those commonplace pronouns as to trans students is viewpoint-driven prior restraint that violates 1A. USCA6 rightly held it is.
November 9, 2025 at 9:49 PM
And USCA6 didn't hold using those pronouns "doesn't count as harassment/insult." Not core issue. Core issue is whether school district policy proscribing students' use of those commonplace pronouns as to trans students is viewpoint-driven prior restraint that violates 1A. USCA6 rightly held it is.
Apparently you didn't read my add-on posts.
Again, USCA6 means pronouns that are commonly used to refer to a person based upon such person's apparent at-birth assigned biological sex (ie, male (XY) he/him/his or female (XX) she/her/hers).
Again, USCA6 means pronouns that are commonly used to refer to a person based upon such person's apparent at-birth assigned biological sex (ie, male (XY) he/him/his or female (XX) she/her/hers).
November 9, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Apparently you didn't read my add-on posts.
Again, USCA6 means pronouns that are commonly used to refer to a person based upon such person's apparent at-birth assigned biological sex (ie, male (XY) he/him/his or female (XX) she/her/hers).
Again, USCA6 means pronouns that are commonly used to refer to a person based upon such person's apparent at-birth assigned biological sex (ie, male (XY) he/him/his or female (XX) she/her/hers).
I also accept trans people, deplore bullies & am glad to honor each individual's pronoun preferences.
But this case isn't about "What's a 'man'/what's a 'woman'?" Nor is it even about trans rights or the right of kids not to be bullied, in school or elsewhere.
It's about the First Amendment.
But this case isn't about "What's a 'man'/what's a 'woman'?" Nor is it even about trans rights or the right of kids not to be bullied, in school or elsewhere.
It's about the First Amendment.
November 9, 2025 at 10:38 AM
I also accept trans people, deplore bullies & am glad to honor each individual's pronoun preferences.
But this case isn't about "What's a 'man'/what's a 'woman'?" Nor is it even about trans rights or the right of kids not to be bullied, in school or elsewhere.
It's about the First Amendment.
But this case isn't about "What's a 'man'/what's a 'woman'?" Nor is it even about trans rights or the right of kids not to be bullied, in school or elsewhere.
It's about the First Amendment.
USCA6 was clearly referring to pronouns commonly used to refer to a person based upon such person's apparent at-birth assigned biological sex (ie, male (XY) he/him/his or female (XX) she/her/hers).
To be clear, I recognize & respect the distinction between at-birth assigned sex & gender identity.
To be clear, I recognize & respect the distinction between at-birth assigned sex & gender identity.
November 9, 2025 at 10:38 AM
USCA6 was clearly referring to pronouns commonly used to refer to a person based upon such person's apparent at-birth assigned biological sex (ie, male (XY) he/him/his or female (XX) she/her/hers).
To be clear, I recognize & respect the distinction between at-birth assigned sex & gender identity.
To be clear, I recognize & respect the distinction between at-birth assigned sex & gender identity.
"Biological pronouns" means what USCA6 clearly intended by same throughout its decision, including at p. 4, ". . We reverse and remand for the entry of an appropriately tailored preliminary injunction barring the district from punishing students for the commonplace use of BIOLOGICAL PRONOUNS . . "
November 9, 2025 at 10:38 AM
"Biological pronouns" means what USCA6 clearly intended by same throughout its decision, including at p. 4, ". . We reverse and remand for the entry of an appropriately tailored preliminary injunction barring the district from punishing students for the commonplace use of BIOLOGICAL PRONOUNS . . "