Lynx Hongxian
@lynxhongxian.bsky.social
she/her. rope art, photography, and dress-up. Sex/SW positive feminism. PNW.
Reposted by Lynx Hongxian
Cosmo's Halloween 🧠👁️ (2/2)
November 1, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Cosmo's Halloween 🧠👁️ (2/2)
Okay fair enough, you're not a communist - you're a mega idiot.
China executing TWO out of the FOUR HUNDRED billionaires isn't a blow against oligarchy - that IS the oligarchy, consolidating it's own power!
China executing TWO out of the FOUR HUNDRED billionaires isn't a blow against oligarchy - that IS the oligarchy, consolidating it's own power!
February 25, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Okay fair enough, you're not a communist - you're a mega idiot.
China executing TWO out of the FOUR HUNDRED billionaires isn't a blow against oligarchy - that IS the oligarchy, consolidating it's own power!
China executing TWO out of the FOUR HUNDRED billionaires isn't a blow against oligarchy - that IS the oligarchy, consolidating it's own power!
There is a difference between killing a few billionaires and fundamentally changing capitalist economic system. China has done the former while retaining a state capitalist economy.
You're the moron if you can't tell the difference. If you love China so much go live there, larper.
You're the moron if you can't tell the difference. If you love China so much go live there, larper.
February 25, 2025 at 4:17 PM
There is a difference between killing a few billionaires and fundamentally changing capitalist economic system. China has done the former while retaining a state capitalist economy.
You're the moron if you can't tell the difference. If you love China so much go live there, larper.
You're the moron if you can't tell the difference. If you love China so much go live there, larper.
You can't contextualize things, can you? 2 out of 400 isn't a dedication to ending billionaires, it's a rounding error.
You rely on these lazy claims of fallacies because we both know you're a whitey china simp who doesn't care what abuses China commits as long as you can larp as a communist
You rely on these lazy claims of fallacies because we both know you're a whitey china simp who doesn't care what abuses China commits as long as you can larp as a communist
February 25, 2025 at 4:14 PM
You can't contextualize things, can you? 2 out of 400 isn't a dedication to ending billionaires, it's a rounding error.
You rely on these lazy claims of fallacies because we both know you're a whitey china simp who doesn't care what abuses China commits as long as you can larp as a communist
You rely on these lazy claims of fallacies because we both know you're a whitey china simp who doesn't care what abuses China commits as long as you can larp as a communist
The same market economic system China adopted under Deng Xiaoping and doubled down on in the decades since?
February 25, 2025 at 4:11 PM
The same market economic system China adopted under Deng Xiaoping and doubled down on in the decades since?
Correct. And yet! China still has 400ish billionaires as of 2024 and a bad record on human rights.
Correct or incorrect?
Correct or incorrect?
February 25, 2025 at 4:08 PM
Correct. And yet! China still has 400ish billionaires as of 2024 and a bad record on human rights.
Correct or incorrect?
Correct or incorrect?
"Other countries put the corrupt to death" except China doesn't live the ideal you claim - it only executes the billionaires who fell out of favor.
And if we're talking about corruption, human rights are EXTREMELY relevant to the criticism of the corruption of countries.
And if we're talking about corruption, human rights are EXTREMELY relevant to the criticism of the corruption of countries.
February 25, 2025 at 4:05 PM
"Other countries put the corrupt to death" except China doesn't live the ideal you claim - it only executes the billionaires who fell out of favor.
And if we're talking about corruption, human rights are EXTREMELY relevant to the criticism of the corruption of countries.
And if we're talking about corruption, human rights are EXTREMELY relevant to the criticism of the corruption of countries.
Literally the top post is you doing the radlib "amerikkka" thing and glazing china for killing billionaires. It's not a strawman - it's apt.
February 25, 2025 at 4:00 PM
Literally the top post is you doing the radlib "amerikkka" thing and glazing china for killing billionaires. It's not a strawman - it's apt.
China still has hundreds of billionaires and a bad record on human rights - why are you glazing them?
February 25, 2025 at 3:59 PM
China still has hundreds of billionaires and a bad record on human rights - why are you glazing them?
China still has hundreds of billionaires and a bad record on human rights - why are you glazing them?
February 25, 2025 at 3:58 PM
China still has hundreds of billionaires and a bad record on human rights - why are you glazing them?
You can't defend your own position.
February 25, 2025 at 3:57 PM
You can't defend your own position.
Fallacy fallacy. You can't defend your own beliefs.
Also, China has the second most billionaires after the US, at 406 according to Forbes. That pedestal of theirs is working just find.
Also, China has the second most billionaires after the US, at 406 according to Forbes. That pedestal of theirs is working just find.
February 25, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Fallacy fallacy. You can't defend your own beliefs.
Also, China has the second most billionaires after the US, at 406 according to Forbes. That pedestal of theirs is working just find.
Also, China has the second most billionaires after the US, at 406 according to Forbes. That pedestal of theirs is working just find.
You're the idiot if you think China executed those billionaires out of some communist idealism rather than the far more likely reason - they fell out of favor with the Party.
And the topic of our rights is important - China is a deeply flawed state with a bad record on human rights. Stop glazing.
And the topic of our rights is important - China is a deeply flawed state with a bad record on human rights. Stop glazing.
February 25, 2025 at 3:53 PM
You're the idiot if you think China executed those billionaires out of some communist idealism rather than the far more likely reason - they fell out of favor with the Party.
And the topic of our rights is important - China is a deeply flawed state with a bad record on human rights. Stop glazing.
And the topic of our rights is important - China is a deeply flawed state with a bad record on human rights. Stop glazing.
Because it's liberal to care about the oppression of trans people, apparently. You might take your status in the world for granted, but I don't.
February 25, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Because it's liberal to care about the oppression of trans people, apparently. You might take your status in the world for granted, but I don't.
Callie spotted!
February 25, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Callie spotted!
Damn you look good for 50+
February 24, 2025 at 7:39 PM
Damn you look good for 50+