@lvclog.bsky.social
GAP had a big viral marketing campaign with Katseye last quarter too
November 21, 2025 at 12:02 PM
GAP had a big viral marketing campaign with Katseye last quarter too
You do recall that Biden pulled out of Afghanistan, right?
November 20, 2025 at 4:12 PM
You do recall that Biden pulled out of Afghanistan, right?
That 41% figure is also not that informative without knowing the corresponding number for non-LGBT characters
November 20, 2025 at 12:18 PM
That 41% figure is also not that informative without knowing the corresponding number for non-LGBT characters
You don't care about any of that lmao. You're just grossed out by them, which is fine, but it doesn't mean you get to use your personal distate as a justification for repression against people minding their business. Again, just get a hobby and stop being an ass.
November 19, 2025 at 1:51 PM
You don't care about any of that lmao. You're just grossed out by them, which is fine, but it doesn't mean you get to use your personal distate as a justification for repression against people minding their business. Again, just get a hobby and stop being an ass.
Maybe try thinking a cycle or two ahead? Labour is at danger of being reduced to a regional party with a handful of seats in the next election. That seems like a much worse outcome than being out of power for 4 years
November 19, 2025 at 4:13 AM
Maybe try thinking a cycle or two ahead? Labour is at danger of being reduced to a regional party with a handful of seats in the next election. That seems like a much worse outcome than being out of power for 4 years
"Stop searching for furry content in order to get upset about" is just an easier remedy for your grievances here lol
November 18, 2025 at 1:34 PM
"Stop searching for furry content in order to get upset about" is just an easier remedy for your grievances here lol
It doesn't need to discouraged either. We don't have to set public policy based on the fact that you purposefully seek content that grosses you out
November 18, 2025 at 1:33 PM
It doesn't need to discouraged either. We don't have to set public policy based on the fact that you purposefully seek content that grosses you out
"Furryism" isn't being encouraged, you can just leave them alone and not obsess over whatever a harmless small group of weirdos are doing
November 18, 2025 at 1:20 PM
"Furryism" isn't being encouraged, you can just leave them alone and not obsess over whatever a harmless small group of weirdos are doing
I am referring to your recent comments on random furry accounts lol
November 18, 2025 at 1:19 PM
I am referring to your recent comments on random furry accounts lol
Do your coworkers (assuming you have any lol) know that your hobby basically entails searching for erotic content of antrorphomic animals so you can act scandalized about it?
November 18, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Do your coworkers (assuming you have any lol) know that your hobby basically entails searching for erotic content of antrorphomic animals so you can act scandalized about it?
"Actually, it's normal behavior to profusely search for furry accounts for research" Do you listen to yourself lmao
November 18, 2025 at 1:15 PM
"Actually, it's normal behavior to profusely search for furry accounts for research" Do you listen to yourself lmao
No, you're just a weirdo pretending that your obsessions are normal and widespread. At least furries are conscious about the fact they're weird.
November 18, 2025 at 1:14 PM
No, you're just a weirdo pretending that your obsessions are normal and widespread. At least furries are conscious about the fact they're weird.
I don't know, just do literally anything besides getting your brain fried by negative polarization against... furries? Lmao
November 18, 2025 at 1:12 PM
I don't know, just do literally anything besides getting your brain fried by negative polarization against... furries? Lmao
>99% of users here or in any other social media aren't obsessively searching for furry content so they can't shriek about it. It's not the fault of the Web 3.0 or whatever you do that
November 18, 2025 at 1:10 PM
>99% of users here or in any other social media aren't obsessively searching for furry content so they can't shriek about it. It's not the fault of the Web 3.0 or whatever you do that
Really? That's not my experience at all. You're yourself probably just a "malajusted individual" without anything better to do lol. Find a hobby
November 18, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Really? That's not my experience at all. You're yourself probably just a "malajusted individual" without anything better to do lol. Find a hobby
You obviously do have a weird derangement with furries, so you're just more prone to believe whatever fabricated bullshit is fed to you, I guess. Also, it's funny that you seemingly dedicated a lot of your activity here to looking for furry accounts so you can get clutch your pearls at them lol
November 18, 2025 at 12:56 PM
You obviously do have a weird derangement with furries, so you're just more prone to believe whatever fabricated bullshit is fed to you, I guess. Also, it's funny that you seemingly dedicated a lot of your activity here to looking for furry accounts so you can get clutch your pearls at them lol
They really aren't though. The only connection in the NY Post article is that he browsed DeviantArt, which is not remotely an exclusive furry website. There wasn't any furry content he posted or interacted with
November 18, 2025 at 12:52 PM
They really aren't though. The only connection in the NY Post article is that he browsed DeviantArt, which is not remotely an exclusive furry website. There wasn't any furry content he posted or interacted with
No, they didn't. Stop lying, their claim is just on they/them pronouns on some DeviantArt, but that's not informative because that website just defaults every account to those pronouns. Stop being gullible
November 18, 2025 at 12:43 PM
No, they didn't. Stop lying, their claim is just on they/them pronouns on some DeviantArt, but that's not informative because that website just defaults every account to those pronouns. Stop being gullible
Honestly, even Blueprint (or at least whoever wrote this article for them) doesn't seem to understand what the results of a conjoint analysis are supposed to mean
November 17, 2025 at 6:06 AM
Honestly, even Blueprint (or at least whoever wrote this article for them) doesn't seem to understand what the results of a conjoint analysis are supposed to mean
Yeah, the presentation does suck and consistently lead to people misinterpreting their numbers
November 17, 2025 at 5:53 AM
Yeah, the presentation does suck and consistently lead to people misinterpreting their numbers
They ask people to choose between the options presented (not necessarily all at once) and the results represent how likely each option was to be chosen compared to the others.
November 17, 2025 at 5:46 AM
They ask people to choose between the options presented (not necessarily all at once) and the results represent how likely each option was to be chosen compared to the others.
If they asked respondents to pick between "being a socialist" and "bringing prices down", the negative result for the former would likely be larger. Not that I think this kind of data is in any way useful or much informative lol
November 17, 2025 at 5:45 AM
If they asked respondents to pick between "being a socialist" and "bringing prices down", the negative result for the former would likely be larger. Not that I think this kind of data is in any way useful or much informative lol
This is a conjoint analysis, the numbers measure the relative performance of the options when contrasted with each other. The "bio fact" and "issue focus" were tested separately (I think), so comparing the results between them doesn't make sense.
November 17, 2025 at 5:43 AM
This is a conjoint analysis, the numbers measure the relative performance of the options when contrasted with each other. The "bio fact" and "issue focus" were tested separately (I think), so comparing the results between them doesn't make sense.
Who are the closeted twink and the entrepeneur in trouble for tax fraud?
November 17, 2025 at 1:36 AM
Who are the closeted twink and the entrepeneur in trouble for tax fraud?
Lula's approvals have risen lately at least, it seems
November 17, 2025 at 12:22 AM
Lula's approvals have risen lately at least, it seems