Luzeze
@luzeze1.bsky.social
Writer, writering occasionally. She/they/it/honk. You do not need to feel obligated to use all of them.
READ THE ORIGINAL FUCKING POST. GO ON, I FUCKING DARE YOU.
NO I FUCKING DIDN'T BASELESSLY ASSERT THAT. YOU'RE JUST MAKING SHIT UP! I DID NOT FUCKING KNOW. WHY ARE YOU SO FUCKING DISHONEST??
NO I FUCKING DIDN'T BASELESSLY ASSERT THAT. YOU'RE JUST MAKING SHIT UP! I DID NOT FUCKING KNOW. WHY ARE YOU SO FUCKING DISHONEST??
July 13, 2025 at 4:09 AM
READ THE ORIGINAL FUCKING POST. GO ON, I FUCKING DARE YOU.
NO I FUCKING DIDN'T BASELESSLY ASSERT THAT. YOU'RE JUST MAKING SHIT UP! I DID NOT FUCKING KNOW. WHY ARE YOU SO FUCKING DISHONEST??
NO I FUCKING DIDN'T BASELESSLY ASSERT THAT. YOU'RE JUST MAKING SHIT UP! I DID NOT FUCKING KNOW. WHY ARE YOU SO FUCKING DISHONEST??
7/33 if you count the "are traps gay" video (I think it's related) so that's 20%. and what other things do you think someone might consider theoretical? jordan peterson? capitalism? because I think this only makes sense if BE was referring to the titles that are abstract/fictional properties
July 13, 2025 at 3:04 AM
7/33 if you count the "are traps gay" video (I think it's related) so that's 20%. and what other things do you think someone might consider theoretical? jordan peterson? capitalism? because I think this only makes sense if BE was referring to the titles that are abstract/fictional properties
7/33 if you count the "are traps gay" video (I think it's related) so that's 20%. and what other things do you think someone might consider theoretical? jordan peterson? capitalism? because I think this only makes sense if BE was referring to the titles that are abstract/fictional properties
July 13, 2025 at 3:03 AM
7/33 if you count the "are traps gay" video (I think it's related) so that's 20%. and what other things do you think someone might consider theoretical? jordan peterson? capitalism? because I think this only makes sense if BE was referring to the titles that are abstract/fictional properties
