ソビエト連邦, sobieto renpou, the so sound is short like in sock

They haven't rigged the review like Cass by appointing SEGM to its board, however, the government is keeping it very much in their control and can choose to interpret it however they wish and refuse to publish anything.

I don't understand. He made it sound like Graham supports trans people's right to exist in peace and is brave for being an early supporter. I thought we were domestic terrorists who need to be punched in the balls? Has he got the wrong guy?

I must continue to point out that she allegedly has a PhD in mathematics but can't seem to apply Bayes' Theorem to figure out why trans bans disproportionately hurt cis women. If she can, then she is consciously working against the rights of all women. Must be a cognitive dissonance nightmare.

www.judiciary.uk/prevention-o... Here it is

Of course you would support segregating trans people from society, that isn't a win for trans rights, that's a resounding loss 🤣

You can't just take away trans women's rights, and then say, "oh look they're fighting back clearly they must be men because women would just take it passively"

£125,000 is the smallest amount of money that looks like a lot of money and thus a lot of support, but divided by 5000 people over 8 years amounts to virtually nothing.

It baffles me because I believe that a mathematician is completely qualified to see that the world around them has a million variables and is not a strict binary. Yet their "evidence" always violates basic statistics. Scary levels of cognitive dissonance.

I thought they could always tell. Guess not.

Thank you for being outspoken. There is an attempt by conservatives to import the Cass review where I live. I referenced Alice in part of my opposition to it, and thankfully here there are many allies who will listen.

Australian law makes it very clear that people can change sex so she's basically arguing that she should be allowed to break the law because she really really wants to. TERFs routinely lose legal battles in Australia. I bet they will cite UK case law again 🤣

This is disgusting. Worried these kids will be used as evidence of "transgender regret" in coming years, which will be misrepresented as being linked to gender affirming care even if they never received any.

They've put their names on one of the assessments

It can take months for a ruling; not looking good for team TERF but if I were a judge I'd be rigorous to make sure the inevitable TERF appeal is laboured and esoteric, as opposed to laughing them out of the room inadvertently giving them fuel for continued media spin and grift.