CORRECTION: Skins are NOT pay to win per say but it's still ridiculous to charge £50 for Sonic and Shadow in nice jackets alongside 3 BATTLE PASSES WITH SKINS ATTACHED TO THEM AS WELL

Buy Crossworlds, better game, worth the money

"But you don't have to pay the stuff"
That's not the issue, the issue is that SEGA and whoever who is handling the game itself have somehow figured this is okay. And after such a strong reception to Crossworlds, you'd think they would be careful especially with how delayed Rumble was initially.

I enjoyed the game, I am going to avoid dropping cash on it. I hope they read the pushback and frustration from people. I understand F2P games need funding but if you can justify £50 for a single skin, you should work for the government with how well you can spin something to be acceptable >_>

And look, I am not naïve to mobile game/cash shops. I've purchased stuff, sure we all have.
But multiple passes?! £50 skins?! Really?! And thing is, people will either defend it or be too scared to say something in hope of becoming Partners.

And here's the kicker: It does have pay to win. Those skins aren't cosmetic. They have bonuses, multipliers. The Cheerleader Rogue skin for example that you get from grinding? 45% bonus.

But £50?! FOR A SKIN?! That is behaviour I expect from League of Legends or Fortnite.

I am privileged I suppose that I do not rely on streaming for my income and given how I've been, probably a massive blessing. But christ, I wish I could move through this downer I'm stuck in and actually DO something. I was delusional to expect 500 followers by end of year given everything -3-

Yush! It doesn't really scratch the surface but these are like the most "obvious" ones