luke foster
@luke--foster.bsky.social
Do you not think that the supremely wealthy are fighting for their class with every weapon they have? What better way do you have to shine a light on extreme inequality? - this is not a fiction or illusion.
October 1, 2025 at 10:05 AM
Do you not think that the supremely wealthy are fighting for their class with every weapon they have? What better way do you have to shine a light on extreme inequality? - this is not a fiction or illusion.
How is this any different to 'Lists' on X?
September 29, 2025 at 10:03 AM
How is this any different to 'Lists' on X?
Never forget: Starmer's actions corrode our better sense of what Starmer is all about 🤪
August 26, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Never forget: Starmer's actions corrode our better sense of what Starmer is all about 🤪
He's correct, you're getting in a right mess.
August 25, 2025 at 5:38 PM
He's correct, you're getting in a right mess.
If you can see that the nation is a product of imagination, where does that leave your patriotism vs nationalism distinction given that both are underpinned by the nation?
August 25, 2025 at 11:07 AM
If you can see that the nation is a product of imagination, where does that leave your patriotism vs nationalism distinction given that both are underpinned by the nation?
You spent 8 years enthusiastically running free PR for a politician who turned out to be a serial liar, a flag waving nativist and a junior partner in a genocide.
Your Johnson-esque churlish response to criticism, waiving it away as boring and humourless, is just "chef's kiss"!
Your Johnson-esque churlish response to criticism, waiving it away as boring and humourless, is just "chef's kiss"!
August 23, 2025 at 9:42 AM
You spent 8 years enthusiastically running free PR for a politician who turned out to be a serial liar, a flag waving nativist and a junior partner in a genocide.
Your Johnson-esque churlish response to criticism, waiving it away as boring and humourless, is just "chef's kiss"!
Your Johnson-esque churlish response to criticism, waiving it away as boring and humourless, is just "chef's kiss"!
So you misunderstood the post you quooted.
Never mind!
Never mind!
June 29, 2025 at 7:21 PM
So you misunderstood the post you quooted.
Never mind!
Never mind!
Remember where you started - they are all psycopaths.
June 29, 2025 at 7:12 PM
Remember where you started - they are all psycopaths.
So you accept a distinction within Trump voters. I guess that the non-deplorables or less-deplorables are the target of the "search for economic explanations for political phenomena". They are persuadable.
June 29, 2025 at 7:06 PM
So you accept a distinction within Trump voters. I guess that the non-deplorables or less-deplorables are the target of the "search for economic explanations for political phenomena". They are persuadable.
I thought we were discussing your theory that they are all psycopaths. How do you explain their voting choices?
June 29, 2025 at 6:37 PM
I thought we were discussing your theory that they are all psycopaths. How do you explain their voting choices?
How do you explain the many people who voted for Obama and Bernie who also voted for Trump?
June 29, 2025 at 5:45 PM
How do you explain the many people who voted for Obama and Bernie who also voted for Trump?
When you start writing articles for Byline Times about the role of the Israeli lobby in UK politics we'll know your emotional displays of concern are serious.
June 29, 2025 at 5:42 PM
When you start writing articles for Byline Times about the role of the Israeli lobby in UK politics we'll know your emotional displays of concern are serious.
So your kind of enlightened interference would be good.
Is that your point?
Is that your point?
June 22, 2025 at 8:03 AM
So your kind of enlightened interference would be good.
Is that your point?
Is that your point?
A guy from Labour's PR department explained it a few months ago:
May 16, 2025 at 8:32 PM
A guy from Labour's PR department explained it a few months ago:
If you're going to attempt a surgical separation of the statements of Powell & Starmer, you really need to avoid the use of terms such as 'populism'.
May 15, 2025 at 1:46 PM
If you're going to attempt a surgical separation of the statements of Powell & Starmer, you really need to avoid the use of terms such as 'populism'.
Reposted by luke foster
But famously you do support Starmer and his party in a cult like manner. You openly declared that you had no principles and you didn't care if he had any and now you complain that it's not what you wanted. Well you wanted no principles you got no principles but non of the desired competence
May 2, 2025 at 11:35 AM
But famously you do support Starmer and his party in a cult like manner. You openly declared that you had no principles and you didn't care if he had any and now you complain that it's not what you wanted. Well you wanted no principles you got no principles but non of the desired competence
Still getting problems here:
Browser tab or profile switching randomly disables soundsource processing.
After time (30 mins to hours) audio becomes progressively more and more distorted.
Pre sequoia soundsource was superb - now it needs restarting 10+ times a day.
Browser tab or profile switching randomly disables soundsource processing.
After time (30 mins to hours) audio becomes progressively more and more distorted.
Pre sequoia soundsource was superb - now it needs restarting 10+ times a day.
March 31, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Still getting problems here:
Browser tab or profile switching randomly disables soundsource processing.
After time (30 mins to hours) audio becomes progressively more and more distorted.
Pre sequoia soundsource was superb - now it needs restarting 10+ times a day.
Browser tab or profile switching randomly disables soundsource processing.
After time (30 mins to hours) audio becomes progressively more and more distorted.
Pre sequoia soundsource was superb - now it needs restarting 10+ times a day.