While this is very much true, we’ve ignored the last several dozen they committed, why should this be any different? (By “we” I mean the international community as a whole)

If we’re going down that route we should wait for the midterm results. Right now the entire line of succession is Republican

#magba seems the only way out at the minute

“Trump should be impeached” - hard agree

“JD Vance should replace him” - less convinced

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again.

👏🏻 Civil 👏🏻 War 👏🏻 2 👏🏻

FOTUS is an acronym I haven’t come across before. I assume it means Führer of the United States?

This coming from the dude that takes from aipac and voted for a felon for ambassador.

As a Jew, it’s insulting when people like you claim antisemitism for everything.

It is abhorrent and wrong to kill innocent people. Take your outrage to Netanyahu instead of funding the annihilation of Gaza.

1) not a man
2) as long as Russia is a member of the UN their soldiers are as accountable to the ICC as everyone else. Given Russia has permanent seats on various UN councils the only way they’ll stop being a UN member is if they withdraw themselves. Which they won’t.

I’m not sure if you’re right or not off the top of my head, but under international law these are Russian soldiers, not terrorists. I’m not arguing that they’re not conducting terrorism, just pointing out that the law sees them as Russian soldiers first.

I’m not talking about US law, especially since I’m British. I’m talking about international law. The kind of law that will get your ass hauled in front of the highest court on the planet.

It is in fact illegal to execute soldiers who have surrendered to you without a very, very good reason. Two wrongs don’t make a right. We are better than that.

To answer Susan’s question: “alternative facts”

Remember Brianna Ghey? I would love to be as privileged as you, with the absolute certainty that I can go wherever I want and not be murdered, but that just isn’t a reality for trans people in the UK

And that right there is exactly the problem. There are people who would love to see me dead who are celebrating this “victory” as a step closer to that end.

So much for Lord Hodge’s statement that “neither side should see this as a victory”

Ah yes, the ad hominem fallacy. The mark of one who refuses to admit defeat so must resort to personal attacks. That should win your case.