Our findings show that state-of-the-art instruction-tuned models perform best, reaching macro F1 scores of nearly 0.8 for both traits.
Our findings show that state-of-the-art instruction-tuned models perform best, reaching macro F1 scores of nearly 0.8 for both traits.
pronounced for the economic dimension (left panel), but also present in the cultural dimension (right panel).
pronounced for the economic dimension (left panel), but also present in the cultural dimension (right panel).
1) extensive operationalisation of two traits (agency and communion) using a validated framework
2) Human labelling and validation, and
3) multiple methods (SVM, XLM-RoBERTa, GPT-4o, Llama-3-8B, Deepseak-V3) and measurement strategies!
1) extensive operationalisation of two traits (agency and communion) using a validated framework
2) Human labelling and validation, and
3) multiple methods (SVM, XLM-RoBERTa, GPT-4o, Llama-3-8B, Deepseak-V3) and measurement strategies!
💡 scholars also engage in more conceptual validation steps which are, however, often not reported. These steps, while not necessarily empirical, nevertheless play a critical role in critically examining assumptions, limitations, and implications.
💡 scholars also engage in more conceptual validation steps which are, however, often not reported. These steps, while not necessarily empirical, nevertheless play a critical role in critically examining assumptions, limitations, and implications.
💡The total number of validation steps varied greatly across studies (0≤n≤6)
💡 Only 9% of validation steps were properly labelled
💡 Overall focus on external (i.e., output comparison ) over internal (i.e., evaluation of measurement model) validation
💡The total number of validation steps varied greatly across studies (0≤n≤6)
💡 Only 9% of validation steps were properly labelled
💡 Overall focus on external (i.e., output comparison ) over internal (i.e., evaluation of measurement model) validation
💡 scholars also engage in more conceptual validation steps which are, however, often not reported. These steps, while not necessarily empirical, nevertheless play a critical role in critically examining assumptions, limitations, and implications.
💡 scholars also engage in more conceptual validation steps which are, however, often not reported. These steps, while not necessarily empirical, nevertheless play a critical role in critically examining assumptions, limitations, and implications.
💡The total number of validation steps varied greatly across studies (0≤n≤6)
💡 Only 9% of validation steps were properly labelled
💡 Overall focus on external (i.e., output comparison ) over internal (i.e., evaluation of measurement model) validation
💡The total number of validation steps varied greatly across studies (0≤n≤6)
💡 Only 9% of validation steps were properly labelled
💡 Overall focus on external (i.e., output comparison ) over internal (i.e., evaluation of measurement model) validation
osf.io/preprints/so...
osf.io/preprints/so...
bit.ly/3tYhHb4
bit.ly/3tYhHb4
👉Scroll the page for info (🔗paper arxiv.org/abs/2307.02863)
👉Download a checklist for different use cases
👉Let us know what you think about it
polisky cssky
👉Scroll the page for info (🔗paper arxiv.org/abs/2307.02863)
👉Download a checklist for different use cases
👉Let us know what you think about it
polisky cssky