Lucy Fisher
@lucyfisher.ft.com
Whitehall editor at the Financial Times 🗞️
Host of the FT’s award-winning ‘Political Fix’ podcast🎙️Author 📚
Host of the FT’s award-winning ‘Political Fix’ podcast🎙️Author 📚
Looking forward to Sketchy Politics later!
None too swampy actually - block heels a breeze… Sun cream required
None too swampy actually - block heels a breeze… Sun cream required
September 6, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Looking forward to Sketchy Politics later!
None too swampy actually - block heels a breeze… Sun cream required
None too swampy actually - block heels a breeze… Sun cream required
Says Natalie Moore, a senior MoD official, in Jan 2024, giving evidence to the judge overseeing the superinjunction proceedings.
I was subject to the superinjunction and the FT was a defendant in the proceedings challenging it, so I've seen the relevant court papers
I was subject to the superinjunction and the FT was a defendant in the proceedings challenging it, so I've seen the relevant court papers
July 16, 2025 at 8:49 PM
Says Natalie Moore, a senior MoD official, in Jan 2024, giving evidence to the judge overseeing the superinjunction proceedings.
I was subject to the superinjunction and the FT was a defendant in the proceedings challenging it, so I've seen the relevant court papers
I was subject to the superinjunction and the FT was a defendant in the proceedings challenging it, so I've seen the relevant court papers
Senior MoD official told High Court in Jan 2024 (in superinjunction proceedings) that James Heappey had briefed Healey on leak in Dec 2023
“Shadow Def Sec shared that he did not believe the LOTO needed briefing at that time and would advise if this view changes at a later date,” official told court
“Shadow Def Sec shared that he did not believe the LOTO needed briefing at that time and would advise if this view changes at a later date,” official told court
July 16, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Senior MoD official told High Court in Jan 2024 (in superinjunction proceedings) that James Heappey had briefed Healey on leak in Dec 2023
“Shadow Def Sec shared that he did not believe the LOTO needed briefing at that time and would advise if this view changes at a later date,” official told court
“Shadow Def Sec shared that he did not believe the LOTO needed briefing at that time and would advise if this view changes at a later date,” official told court
NAO has spoken out after a senior mandarin claimed – to High Court in Jan – that the MoD and NAO had come to an agreement about how the data breach should be dealt with in MoD annual report last year
(Mandarin also said MoD then failed to include allegedly agreed formulation 🙄)
(Mandarin also said MoD then failed to include allegedly agreed formulation 🙄)
July 16, 2025 at 12:26 PM
NAO has spoken out after a senior mandarin claimed – to High Court in Jan – that the MoD and NAO had come to an agreement about how the data breach should be dealt with in MoD annual report last year
(Mandarin also said MoD then failed to include allegedly agreed formulation 🙄)
(Mandarin also said MoD then failed to include allegedly agreed formulation 🙄)