Lucilla Piccari
@lucillapiccari.bsky.social
MD, PhD, Pulmonologist, #PulmonaryHypertension specialist @researchmar.bsky.social, registries&data, environmental activist. She/Her. I claim my opinions 😊
Also @LucillaPiccari@med-mastodon.com
Also @LucillaPiccari@med-mastodon.com
Reposted by Lucilla Piccari
One of the ones blaring that correlation and causation are the same. One of the ones parroting nonsensical claims about Tylenol.
LLMs are, in science writing as in everything else, representing the average to below average of what exists. They're mediocre at best. Why would you want to BE that?
LLMs are, in science writing as in everything else, representing the average to below average of what exists. They're mediocre at best. Why would you want to BE that?
November 13, 2025 at 4:23 PM
One of the ones blaring that correlation and causation are the same. One of the ones parroting nonsensical claims about Tylenol.
LLMs are, in science writing as in everything else, representing the average to below average of what exists. They're mediocre at best. Why would you want to BE that?
LLMs are, in science writing as in everything else, representing the average to below average of what exists. They're mediocre at best. Why would you want to BE that?
Reposted by Lucilla Piccari
I also note what they found: that the LLM can rehash, summarize, stuff that's already been written.
It cannot interpret. It can't put the correct context around the work.
Basically, ChatGPT in some ways CAN be a science writer: It will be one of the SHITTY ONES.
It cannot interpret. It can't put the correct context around the work.
Basically, ChatGPT in some ways CAN be a science writer: It will be one of the SHITTY ONES.
November 13, 2025 at 4:22 PM
I also note what they found: that the LLM can rehash, summarize, stuff that's already been written.
It cannot interpret. It can't put the correct context around the work.
Basically, ChatGPT in some ways CAN be a science writer: It will be one of the SHITTY ONES.
It cannot interpret. It can't put the correct context around the work.
Basically, ChatGPT in some ways CAN be a science writer: It will be one of the SHITTY ONES.
Reposted by Lucilla Piccari
There’s definitely a socialism of fools going on—men are being offered domination over women so that they won’t notice how brutally and sadistically they themselves are being dominated by the rich.
November 13, 2025 at 4:50 PM
There’s definitely a socialism of fools going on—men are being offered domination over women so that they won’t notice how brutally and sadistically they themselves are being dominated by the rich.
Reposted by Lucilla Piccari
Moreover, "it's more complicated than that" and "adults in the room" is just as much a projected image as "man of the people, common sense." It's down to voters to discern the authenticity of those positions.
November 13, 2025 at 7:56 AM
Moreover, "it's more complicated than that" and "adults in the room" is just as much a projected image as "man of the people, common sense." It's down to voters to discern the authenticity of those positions.